Possible, Quinn slipping to 9 is a must though. We'd need both 2nd's to trade up for Ginn.
Hope this doesn't happen though. Rather have our 2 2nds than Ginn.
I agree on both points. Quinn could slip to #9, and Ginn could slip into the 20s, in which we could use our two 2nd-rounders to move up and get him, so it's realistic.
However, should we do it? Absolutely not (IMHO of course). If Quinn falls to #9 we could nab our franchise QB, then we could get a quality WR in round 2, along with an OT/OL to help us out in that area. I would MUCH rather go about it that way then taking Ginn. I know a lot of people, including Boomer and the other resident gurus are sold on him, and I respect that, but there is just something about him that doesn't do it for me. I am not so impressed by his speed and ability to create big plays in the return game that I overlook his seemingly poor hands, both at WR and when returning kicks/punts, his very unpolished route running, and his lack of aggressiveness and size.
I fully understand that his poor routes and lack of size/aggressiveness wasn't too big of a problem in college, but the NFL isn't college, and I just don't see him being able to rely soley on his speed to burn past the top DBs at the NFL level. I see Ginn as another Dante Hall, great speed and wows in the return game, but never matures into a great WR. I'd rather use my 2nd-rounders to take some OL help and a WR that may be a little slower but is bigger and more physical and has great hands. Remember, WR isn't a MAJOR priority, Chambers performs well when he gets consistancy at QB, Booker isn't BAD, he's just old, lol, Hagan is coming along nicely, and that was in our horrid QB situation last year, I expect him to be even better when there is some sense or normalcy at QB, and we signed Hakim, who another Booker type guy, not a gamebreaker, and he's old, but he's solid. That is enough right now to allow us to take a WR later and not have to focus on one in the first round.
