rkit55
Rookie
This post is just ridiculous. The ultimate sign of a homer is someone who needs to find ways to manipulate stats in their favor. Do you even realize what you are saying? Sanchez is a good if you only count the games he plays well. I get that you are trying to say that his stats are abnormally bad because of a few disastrous games, but that is not a reason discount them. Yes he definitely has had good games this year, but its not like all of his bad games occurred during one part of the season. That makes his play this year inconsistent at best.
I haven't been on this board that long but I've noticed you seem to have a pattern of only seeing the stats you want to see. In the Brady/Manning debate you only want to use playoff stats and declare regular season stats to be meaningless. If that were true then only 12 teams actually play football every year. In reality, you are just looking for a way to ignore the fact that, over multiple 16 game seasons, Manning's defenses showed to be consistently worse than Brady's. But you'd prefer to use the limited sample size of playoff appearances that still show Manning to have a worse D (albeit much closer). The most accurate portrayal of the caliber of their defenses would be to count all games played, but that approach wouldn't back your opinion so I guess there must be something wrong with it.
You even use the same statistical manipulation practice in the Cameron Wake thread. You decide that that the 3 sacks in the Bills game don't count for some reason, but the Jet's games hold increased significance because you happened to see them.
You aren't using all of the stats that are available. Instead you are choosing to only use the ones you see fit. In the end this makes all of the stats you give completely meaningless.
Well said friend