Wait….There is no way this kid ever even played football at the Pop Warner level. And to his point about the Dolphins NFL offense not lasting…What ****ing offense does last? I mean for **** sake….The Bills offense didn’t last half a year….Josh Allen is now handing out picks like he’s Monty Hall. Probably the stupidest video I’ve ever watched.
I've watched people cry for the next Dan Marino for 20 years. Fans talk about wanting a QB they can root for over the next 10-15 years. That seems to be what most define as a "franchise" player, a multi-contract guy who they don't have to even think about and who can be a fixture for a decade plus.
I don't think anybody wants to view Tua as a temporary highlight who the Dolphins will be looking to move on from the way the Falcons did with Ryan, the Rams did with Goff, the Chiefs did with Alex Smith, the Seahawks did with Wilson, the Lions did with Stafford, or the 49ers are trying to with Garoppolo and the Titans are trying to do with Tannehill in favor of Lance and Willis, respectively.
I think there are 2 groups of fans who are talking past each other. There are fans who want a QB for the next 15 years and fans who want to cheer that Tua's the most efficient QB in 2022 and are happy to surround that in isolation.
"The QB question," the issue of finding a franchise guy, has historically been about finding a long-term answer who can be successful independent of offensive scheme--someone who can evolve regardless of who the WRs are and whether the running game is there or not. That was true of Brees, Manning, Brady, Rodgers, etc. It's now true of Mahomes as well.
The debate seems not to be about the immediate success of the 2022 offense but of whether Tua is the type of guy who could go handle any sort of offense and who'd be successful if (or when) Tyreek/Waddle were to go down with an ACL or something horrible.
It's certainly fine to "live in the now," but these days a lot of football fans draw their inspiration from seeking out a deeper understanding of what is sustainable and what isn't. That can be seen as pessimistic or not sufficiently celebratory.
I think the argument about whether you're "for" or "against" Tua is kind of stupid. We've obviously seen he can play as well as any of the mid-tier guys. That was true even last year. He was good on 3rd down and in the red zone then, too.
But I think it's possible to be happy and critical at the same time.