oh, and check out this "yeah, right" moment from the media:
http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2003560001-2007300340,00.html
"IN another disturbing twist on the Chris Benoit killings, it now appears the grappler murdered his seven-year-old son using his own wrestling finishing hold.
Police in Georgia are speculating that Benoit ended young Daniel's life with the Crippler Crossface – the same move that he used in almost all his matches, including when he beat Triple H for the heavyweight title at WWE WrestleMania XX.
District Attorney Scott Ballard said: "A choke hold was used to strangle the boy, rather than hands, because there's no bruising consistent with strangulation by hands."
Respected American wrestling scribe Dave Meltzer added: "The police investigators were perplexed by the nature of the bruising on Daniel, until one of them watched footage of a Benoit wrestling match, saw him using the move, and in looking closely, realized the bruising patterns on Daniel matched the application of the hold." "
huh? why is Meltzer jumping on the speculation bandwagon???
first; any investigator who watched Chris apply the Crippler Crossface hold on video would hopefully note that it is not applied around the throat.
second; if Chris locked up on his son's arm to apply the Crossface with the pressure it would take to kill him, he would have torn his arm out of socket and broken his neck, neither of which happened.
third; a rear naked choke, with the crook of the arm around the throat would be much quicker and efficient.
that child's body would have been ravaged by that hold, not bruised.