Trick question because the answer is obviously Tannehill. Don't think there's much of a competition for second best qb in the division.
none of the above should be an option.
thills and moore about same, except moore never had chance plus philibin wamt him for insurance...At this point, none would be my answer. As mentioned Geno and EJ are young but RT has shown more potential. Philbin doesn't think Moore is better than RT and I agree.
how dose brady just have one yr left. he just miss superbowl w scrub wr.. only person talk about thills is dolphins fans.Might have been interesting if Brady was left in as an option. I think Brady has one good year left, if that. Would you trade one or two good years for Tannehill's potential?
Well, my first answer is Moore. But if I'm playing along with this poll, EJ and Geno both only have 1 year in this league, so there is a chance for growth there. The other thing is, while a great QB can help improve an offense, the whole is only as good as the sum of its parts. New England has a system that got tested in 2008 that resulted in Matt Cassel taking the helm and getting them to an 11-5 season. I think Tannehill has been surrounded with decent talent, and a roster that has only improved as he's been here. Where as the Jets and Bills (for the most part) don't have much of the talent on offense that we do.
I would love to see what would happen if we could shuffle the QBs in the AFC east for a few games, that would really expose where the blame/credit is due.