Question for the older Dolfans that remember David
Woodley.Neither was a great passer,but who was the
better athlete between him and Fiedler?
I watched every Woodley game he played and every Fiedler game played. Woodley had Shula during a time when Shula was still a genius of a coach - if you recall the '82 season (strike or no strike), it was the combination of Woodley and Strock (Wood-Strock) that got them to the SuperBowl. Shula would yank Woodley when he struggled, or he needed to come from behind to win that year. In the SuperBowl, for some odd reason he kept Woodley in too long - despite the fact that he did NOT COMPLETE A SINGLE PASS in the entire second half.
That said, I found myself begging for someone to put me out of my misery more when I watched Fiedler. He tried hard and had guts, but he had a fairie's arm. Woodley had a strong arm contrary to what some are saying here. Also, Woodley was a tougher runner, and he even caught a TD pass.
To be fair to Fiedler, he had the opposite of a genius as coach - Wannstedt. Fiedler might have thrived under Shula in the early '80's. The team was pretty much the same - great D, a decent running game and no receivers.
I liked watching Woodley. I cringed watching Fiedler. This is a tough one - I'll go with Woodley since he did get us to a SuperBowl - I know, not the greatest logic, but I gotta pick.
PS
Woodley went to Pittsburgh after the '84 season - signing the biggest contract in the NFL for QBs at the time. He had 2 sub-par years there, then retired. Had a liver transplant - he was an alchoholic and died 10 years after the transplant. His ex-wife said he drank an entire case of beer the night before the SuperBowl due to nerves... He had some social-anxiety disorder that probably wasn't recognized at the time - and so he drank. Right to the grave at age 44...