Im pretty sure he used "than" properlyYou don't even know the difference between than and then.
Trust me, no one thinks your smart.
I'm guessing you said the same thing about CJ Stroud and Ohio State QB's last year.
Im pretty sure he used "than" properlyYou don't even know the difference between than and then.
Trust me, no one thinks your smart.
I'm guessing you said the same thing about CJ Stroud and Ohio State QB's last year.
Im pretty sure he used "than" properly
I have him on ignore, so didnt see that, lol. (Peaked at his post to see what the commotion was about)Not in his signature when he says “I am smarter then you”.
Yes, Ive made multiple arguments. The entire history of usc QBs.
The fact he never actually won his biggest/most important games at USC.
They branded him with pink nails.
He won the Heisman. ( That definitely wasn't his idea. He was told to do that as humiliation ritual to get into NFL)
These are all ingredients for NFL failure.
Or at the very least a indicator that he will never reach or win a SB.
I have him on ignore, so didnt see that, lol. (Peaked at his post to see what the commotion was about)
:)
The entire history of USC QBs is not an argument. What happens to a QB from USC that makes them bad in the pros?
He won several big/important games at OU/USC ('21 vs Texas, '21 vs Oregon, '22 @ UCLA, '22 vs Notre Dame, '23 vs Arizona). Most of his losses the defense gave up 35+ points.
Pink nails? Not even worth a response.
Several Heisman winners have been to and won Super Bowls.
So again, unless you want to cite actual reasons based on his play, mechanics, measurables, mental acumen, etc., then you have no argument.
Try to stay away from the conspiracy theories, more people will take you seriously if you do.
BYU QBs have been good in the NFL so I understand why the Jets drafted him. There’s still hope!He’s a historically bad player. He’s the Zach Wilson of FH posters.
Cal at least has 4 QBs who reached SBs and one who won one.I think Williams will be a bust also, but not because of USC.
I mean, that was a line of reasoning for not drafting Aaron Rodgers( not USC of course). Was it not?
It most certainly, absolutely is an argument when it keeps happening for 50 or more years. It means the powers that be want to keep it that way.The entire history of USC QBs is not an argument. What happens to a QB from USC that makes them bad in the pros?
He won several big/important games at OU/USC ('21 vs Texas, '21 vs Oregon, '22 @ UCLA, '22 vs Notre Dame, '23 vs Arizona). Most of his losses the defense gave up 35+ points.
Pink nails? Not even worth a response.
Several Heisman winners have been to and won Super Bowls.
So again, unless you want to cite actual reasons based on his play, mechanics, measurables, mental acumen, etc., then you have no argument.
Try to stay away from the conspiracy theories, more people will take you seriously if you do.
He’s a historically bad poster. He’s the Zach Wilson of FH posters.
This is of course a false strawman.He’s a historically bad poster. He’s the Zach Wilson of FH posters.
Zach Wilson is 2-2 vs Buffalo.He’s a historically bad poster. He’s the Zach Wilson of FH posters.
Zach Wilson is 2-2 vs Buffalo.
Miami is 2-11 since 2018.
So apparently I'm in pretty good company.
I have him on ignore![]()
Sigh......So you’re saying Zach Wilson is a good QB and Caleb Williams sucks.
Noted.