BJ Raji anyone? | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

BJ Raji anyone?

CChambers7284

The Biggest Fins Fan from CT
Joined
Jan 9, 2005
Messages
1,199
Reaction score
4
Age
35
Location
connecticut
Ive been researching a little, listening to some podcasts, reading draft guides etc. and BJ Raji the DT from BC really intrigues me. He is big and can play NT in the nfl. He has had a little controversy with the drug accusation and stuff but it possible that was just a false story. If we can try to trade up and get this guy i think we should.

http://www.nfldraftscout.com/ratings/dsprofile.php?pyid=9156&draftyear=2009&genpos=DT

It just seems like he would make our run d and really allow crowder and ayodle or whomever is behind him to play a little more freely and make some bigger plays.
 
yea i think ever one in here would love to get BJ Raji but that isnt going to happen he is easly a top ten pick
 
The smart teams almost never trade up. Go look at the teams recently who have traded up to get players (ie: Washington). Go look at the smart teams who have traded down or gotten solid value with their late first round pick (ie: Dallas, New England, Pittsburgh, New York Giants).

One thing that almost everyone here fails to take into account is our struggling economy. It is absolutely affecting how teams approach free agency and the acquisition of players via trade. If we were in a stable economy right now, I think you would see teams like the Giants, Eagles, Titans, and even us making a STRONG push for Anquan Boldin. There's just no way we trade up in this economy to take a player we're going to have to pay millions of dollars without proving anything in the field of play.
 
The smart teams almost never trade up. Go look at the teams recently who have traded up to get players (ie: Washington). Go look at the smart teams who have traded down or gotten solid value with their late first round pick (ie: Dallas, New England, Pittsburgh, New York Giants).

One thing that almost everyone here fails to take into account is our struggling economy. It is absolutely affecting how teams approach free agency and the acquisition of players via trade. If we were in a stable economy right now, I think you would see teams like the Giants, Eagles, Titans, and even us making a STRONG push for Anquan Boldin. There's just no way we trade up in this economy to take a player we're going to have to pay millions of dollars without proving anything in the field of play.

Baltimore traded up for Ngata, I think that may have worked out well.
 
Baltimore traded up for Ngata, I think that may have worked out well.

I'm not saying that you can't trade up and win. Baltimore is a well run franchise and they're solid talent evaluators. Cleveland, Oakland, St. Louis...not so much. You're MUCH better off trading down.
 
I rarely crow about my finds.....I was talking about the Rajmeister when some "Experts" that post on this very board had no ****ing idea who he was. Just goes to show....We're all experts.
 
I rarely crow about my finds.....I was talking about the Rajmeister when some "Experts" that post on this very board had no ****ing idea who he was. Just goes to show....We're all experts.


Well do get credit for saying we should draft Matt CAssel or Tony Romo.

Maybe we should become scouts lol Definately beats running two miles in 20 below weather.
 
Baltimore traded up for Ngata, I think that may have worked out well.

to be fair, that was only one spot. Teams like Baltimore, Pittsburgh, and a few others only trade up if there is a player they really covet (Ravens with Ngata, Steelers with Troy Polamalu), then they stick to their draft board like glue. Thing is, their draft boards rarely ever look anything remotely close to everybody else's board (the Steelers are all about drafting who fits their system value or reach be damned).

The Jaguars are another team that stayed to their board, but their board has turned out to be wrong in a lot of ways (Reggie Williams, Matt Jones, and Mercedes Lewis all disappointed).

I'm sure everybody in our war room would love to get Raji, but he just won't make it to an area we can realistically trade up to get him without giving up a lot of picks.
 
The smart teams almost never trade up. Go look at the teams recently who have traded up to get players (ie: Washington). Go look at the smart teams who have traded down or gotten solid value with their late first round pick (ie: Dallas, New England, Pittsburgh, New York Giants).

One thing that almost everyone here fails to take into account is our struggling economy. It is absolutely affecting how teams approach free agency and the acquisition of players via trade. If we were in a stable economy right now, I think you would see teams like the Giants, Eagles, Titans, and even us making a STRONG push for Anquan Boldin. There's just no way we trade up in this economy to take a player we're going to have to pay millions of dollars without proving anything in the field of play.

I dont think the economy has anything to do with it.

The NFL is probably one of the most lucrative industries now, and even if fans dont attend games, they will watch on TV and the TV deals are Billion dollar deals. Merchandising may be affected, but again, the money teams get from revenue sharing and TV still keep franchises strong.

The problem is two-fold. First, all teams are up against a salary cap. With rookie contracts running wild (specifically top 10 picks), it leaves the team with less salary cap money to fill other positions. Dumping 40 million dollars on an unproven draft pick can cripple a team if the player doesnt pan out.

The second reason is that it is cost prohibitive pick-wise to trade up into the top 10. It is generally accepted now that the best value picks come in the later rounds, second and third in particular. Most people value top 10 picks to the outdated Jimmy Johnson pick value chart, which would require multiple high round picks to move up very few spots. Teams simply can't justify taking 1 top tier player instead of 2 (or more) slightly lower rated players.

You can say that quality is better than quantity, but in today's NFL, where players are always getting injured, it is important to have depth, whether that depth be a solid, all-around first team, or a deep bench.

I think that BP thinks (yea, sounds funny) that you want a large quantity of quality players (as opposed to a small quantity of studs.) It is the opposite of putting all your eggs in one basket. You've gotta diversify those funds!

I think he has shown that since he has been here. He has greatly upgraded the bottom half of our roster, which has paid great dividends.
 
Back
Top Bottom