Chambers34Phins
Practice Squad
Boston is young... he has time to change, and he is coming to the only wr coach that could control if he comes here.
Boston or Moulds?Who's better?
- Thread starter Junoir 61503
- Start date
Boston is young... he has time to change, and he is coming to the only wr coach that could control if he comes here.
- Joined
- Dec 23, 2001
- Messages
- 9,591
- Reaction score
- 1
that's because you are comparing 2 specific players. Helloooo! You can't compare w/o looking at past performances.
To say Boston is a top wr, you will have to look based on his last performance which is nothing but a no.2.
You will all see the truth on Boston based on what Miaimi will pay him. If he is indeed a top tier wr, then Spielman will pay him top $$$. (I hope they do).
Finfans should view the Boston signing like they did seau, an upgrade over what you have and nothing more. Some finfans talk like you guys are signing Moss or Owens.
Chambers34Phins
Practice Squad
Also a good point.... look at jamal lewis 2 years after his....
Junoir 61503
Practice Squad
You can't compare Seau signing to Boston, Seau is coming to the end and Boston is coming into his prime.That was a bad comparison.
DolPhadelphia
Practice Squad
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2003
- Messages
- 98
- Reaction score
- 0
Moulds, hands down.
- Joined
- Dec 23, 2001
- Messages
- 9,591
- Reaction score
- 1
They are both upgrades at their positions. An upgrade . Do you know what that means? I never said Boston was on his way down.
I cant stand it when fans vote for there guy just because they have them. Watch a couple of Bills games, and then try to tell me Boston is better.
It is not even close. All you say that Moulds had a bad year last year? HE WAS OUT FOR 7 GAMES ...
There is absolutely no comparison. Moulds is A LOT better than Boston. I dont give a **** about potential. Ryan Leaf had potential.
Boston has a edge on strength but Boston doesnt make the one handed catches, and the behind the back jumpers in the endzone ... etc - Moulds has finess and strength.
I remember Bledsoe got nailed when he was throwing against the Jaguars last year and barely got the ball out - the ball traveled 20 yards and was headed straight to the ground, Moulds came out of no where leaped freken 8 yards and made an amazing 1 handed fingertip catch on a wabbling ball.
Finess and Strength - Moulds by a mile.
It is not even close. All you say that Moulds had a bad year last year? HE WAS OUT FOR 7 GAMES ...
There is absolutely no comparison. Moulds is A LOT better than Boston. I dont give a **** about potential. Ryan Leaf had potential.
Boston has a edge on strength but Boston doesnt make the one handed catches, and the behind the back jumpers in the endzone ... etc - Moulds has finess and strength.
I remember Bledsoe got nailed when he was throwing against the Jaguars last year and barely got the ball out - the ball traveled 20 yards and was headed straight to the ground, Moulds came out of no where leaped freken 8 yards and made an amazing 1 handed fingertip catch on a wabbling ball.
Finess and Strength - Moulds by a mile.
Boston"s first 5 yrs were better than Moulds first 5 yrs. It is not a stretch to believe that when all is said and done Boston's career will be better than Moulds.
If the question is who is better right now, I'd say Moulds, but I don't think the spread is huge. I have Moulds in the top 5 and Boston in the top 10.
If the question is who I'd rather get, then I'll take the 25 yr old over the 30 yr old.
If the question is who is better right now, I'd say Moulds, but I don't think the spread is huge. I have Moulds in the top 5 and Boston in the top 10.
If the question is who I'd rather get, then I'll take the 25 yr old over the 30 yr old.
dolfan25
Club Member
Moulds 8 seasons- 3 seasons with over a 1000 yds
Boston 5 seasons- 2 seasons with over a 1000 yds.
Anyone who thinks either Moulds or Boston is a top 4 receiver is overrating both of them.
Is Moulds better than Moss, TO, Harrison, Torry Holt or Isaac Bruce. No way. Heck Jerry Rice has been nearly as productive in the last 5 years as Moulds. The exact same thing can be said of Boston. He's not as good as those top 5 but neither is Moulds and anyone who says so is as much a Bills homer as any Dolphins homer.
And Moulds played in 13 games last year not 7 whether he was hurt or not he played in 13 games.
Boston 5 seasons- 2 seasons with over a 1000 yds.
Anyone who thinks either Moulds or Boston is a top 4 receiver is overrating both of them.
Is Moulds better than Moss, TO, Harrison, Torry Holt or Isaac Bruce. No way. Heck Jerry Rice has been nearly as productive in the last 5 years as Moulds. The exact same thing can be said of Boston. He's not as good as those top 5 but neither is Moulds and anyone who says so is as much a Bills homer as any Dolphins homer.
And Moulds played in 13 games last year not 7 whether he was hurt or not he played in 13 games.
SMadison29
What Sherman aspires to be
LOL, talk about a homer.
Boston is better. What's this being more proven junk? Boston hasn't proven himself?
1-Moss
2-Harrison
3-Owens
4-Holt
Others better than Moulds: Toomer, Horn, Boston, Bruce, Jimmy Smith, Coles.
Soon to be unarguably better: Chambers, Santana, Chad Johnson.
finfan54
Active Roster
- Joined
- Aug 3, 2002
- Messages
- 26,168
- Reaction score
- 29
Moulds doesnt scare me at all. But he was injured this year which means it doesnt mean squat if he is standing on the sideline. Moulds has been shut down like 3 or 4 times by our DB's. Moulds has only made us pay like 2 or 3.
I dont think boston/Moulds comaprison is one you can make right now cus of moulds injury last year and boston not as productive as years past. I think they both are great WR's.
- Joined
- Dec 23, 2001
- Messages
- 9,591
- Reaction score
- 1
You call someone a homer and then go on to play Ms. Cleo.
