Brad Allen's Officiating Crew Suspended

[Rev Kev]

I mean, it's not that hard to do even a small iota of research on the writer first. All you do is click their name on the article.

Naomi Hernandez, Author at Newsmous

Latest News, Tennis, Sports

newsmous.com

Then you say, wait a second. You go to the homepage and the entire site is written by that writer along with it being 70% Taylor Swift celebrity ****.

This was the article YOU linked, do some diligence first.

 

[CF Dolphan]

The crew likely only got suspended because of the missed PI (that subsequently led to a chiefs loss). The legal hit on Mahomes that was flagged only reinforces the sissy rules the NFL wants to implement to protect their golden boys so I doubt they were even thinking about that

 

[brumdog44]

And it never will be. The NFL's gonna keep this hush hush, as it would diminish the league integrity and feed the narrative that the refs rig games.

I got the article from a tweet by Travis Kelce though.

1. Don’t buy into everything you read.

2. Don’t assume that if someone tweets something that it is legit

3. Check to make sure that the person you are quote tweeting is the actual account.

You can get as mad about it as you want, but this is a fake story that you bought into.

 

[Lloyd Heilbrunn]

And there is nothing in the linked article that even mentions a suspension other than the headline.

 

[Awsi Dooger]

Click on the writer’s name and read everything that she has written….it’s all just Chiefs fan articles. The story isn’t true.

But that didn't prevent the predictable sources from jumping in to rant about fixed games, with the predictable legion of Likers.

Empty thrives in this era

 

[Scotty_P]

1. Don’t buy into everything you read.

2. Don’t assume that if someone tweets something that it is legit

3. Check to make sure that the person you are quote tweeting is the actual account.

You can get as mad about it as you want, but this is a fake story that you bought into.

My post starts off with the word "apparently".

"Apparently" is an adverb that means "evidently" or "obviously". It can be used to indicate that information is something that has been heard but is not certain to be true..

I'm not a fact checker, nor do I have time. Take it for what its worth. If you don't like it, keep scrolling or just simply accept the irony that this same crew screwed another team.

 

[Scotty_P]

I mean, it's not that hard to do even a small iota of research on the writer first. All you do is click their name on the article.

Naomi Hernandez, Author at Newsmous

Latest News, Tennis, Sports

newsmous.com

Then you say, wait a second. You go to the homepage and the entire site is written by that writer along with it being 70% Taylor Swift celebrity ****.

This was the article YOU linked, do some diligence first.

My post starts off with the word "apparently".

"Apparently" is an adverb that means "evidently" or "obviously". It can be used to indicate that information is something that has been heard but is not certain to be true..

I'm not a fact checker, nor do I have time. Take it for what its worth. If you don't like it, keep scrolling or just simply accept the irony that this same crew screwed another team.

 

[Scotty_P]

This thread should be junked.

My post starts off with the word "apparently".

"Apparently" is an adverb that means "evidently" or "obviously". It can be used to indicate that information is something that has been heard but is not certain to be true..

I'm not a fact checker, nor do I have time. Take it for what its worth. If you don't like it, keep scrolling or just simply accept the irony that this same crew screwed another team.

 

[Neptune]

Does anyone know what “apparently” means or if the OP is a fact checker or not?

 

[Stoobz]

My post starts off with the word "apparently".

"Apparently" is an adverb that means "evidently" or "obviously". It can be used to indicate that information is something that has been heard but is not certain to be true..

I'm not a fact checker, nor do I have time. Take it for what its worth. If you don't like it, keep scrolling or just simply accept the irony that this same crew screwed another team.

Dude, I was not attacking you. Lighten up. I read it for exactly what it is/was and replied. Forgive me. No harm intended. I'll try and be more eloquent in the future.

 

[Vaark]

 

[Scotty_P]

Dude, I was not attacking you. Lighten up. I read it for exactly what it is/was and replied. Forgive me. No harm intended. I'll try and be more eloquent in the future.

My apologies. Others were and I took it out on you. Your original post of "taking it with a grain of salt" was warranted.

 

[E30M3]

My post starts off with the word "apparently".

"Apparently" is an adverb that means "evidently" or "obviously". It can be used to indicate that information is something that has been heard but is not certain to be true..

I'm not a fact checker, nor do I have time. Take it for what its worth. If you don't like it, keep scrolling or just simply accept the irony that this same crew screwed another team.

I don't give a **** about the initial post. You were sarcastic as **** with another poster who was questioning your post and you got called out which was the post I quoted. You have more than enough time to reply to these posts which took about 2m less than it took to check the link you yourself used here. Just take the L.

 

[The Ghost]

Refs made the "just" call on the non-PI call. Maybe not by the rule book, but by the code of ethics.

That late hit penalty was a farce so compounding it with a PI that would've bailed Mahomes out (because he made a bad throw) and wouldn't have been right.

The team that played better won.

 

[Ray R]

Dude, I was not attacking you. Lighten up. I read it for exactly what it is/was and replied. Forgive me. No harm intended. I'll try and be more eloquent in the future.

I find it hard to believe you could be more eloquent.
Now. knowing what you are talking about is another question. - LOL