Breakdown of Tannehill's 12 Int's | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Breakdown of Tannehill's 12 Int's

Bruzer

Bruzer

FinHeaven VIP
Club Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2006
Messages
3,523
Reaction score
1,221
Location
Iowa
Just wanted to share this because with the good comes the bad. Whether you like his analysis or not figured worth a share because like the last one he provides two angles on each interception it seems so you get to see them pretty well.

Tannehill definitely improved as the season went on in terms of interceptions. After the Packers game most of his interceptions came either from good defense, unlucky bounces, or just bad play from his teammates. That’s not to say he wasn’t completely blameless, but it’s pretty clear to me that as he settled into the new offense that Dolphin’s OC Bill Lazor had installed he became much more comfortable and made better decisions overall. Those short right throwing issues I mentioned earlier? I’d put most of that on bad luck. You have plays 7, 8, 9, and 11 in that category and I would put none of the blame on Tannehill for those interceptions. They came either as a result of an unlucky bounce, or a bad play from his receivers. Taking those interceptions out of his season and Tannehill has an 8 interception season. With Bill Lazor’s offense looking like a perfect fit for Tannehill he could be poised for a sub 10 interception season. It will depend slightly on how much defenses pick up on Tannehill’s tendencies in Lazor’s offense, but so far the future is looking very bright for Tannehill.
Click to expand...

http://nflbreakdowns.com/ryan-tannehills-12-ints-in-2014/?singlepage=1
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hes got some of those right i will give him that...and i have to say that the 2nd int vs the pack was on the qb...he decided presnap he had single high he would post snap finish his drop look off the single high safety to the middle of the field and go to hartline on the boundary but the db was running out front the entire way he has to come off that with a hartline at least...if thats devantae parker despite that db out fronti think you throw it...

But brian hartline nope...i called this one wrong earlier

This guy clearly though doesnt understand what a stare down actually is...
 
Thanks Bruzer.

Again, the vids are a good resource but his defensive coverage ID's and offensive breakdowns make me want to tear my eyes out.
 
Yeah he says tannehill reads the coverages wrong to which my reply is...my ass

Doesnt understand man vs zone either...somebody on that site should be proofreading those things for accuracy
 
Stills&Landry said:
That should have been Nickel 3-3-5, right? Same as the formation BB used early on with the Pats.
Click to expand...


Simply put 3-4 is 3 DL's and 4 LB's and a Nickel defense refers to the 5th DB. Unless you've got 12 men on the field, there is no such thing as 3-4 Nickel.

As far as what you might be referring to, you'd have to be more specific as to the numbered play he was trying to describe because his "analysis" is a mess.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom