I guess we all know now that Campbell from West Point, was drafted at 218 (I think).
As an Army grad he is supposed to be committed to 5 years of service to our country as an officer in the Army. There was every chance he would serve overseas and specifically in harms way in Iraq & Afganistan. However the Army has said they may make an exception for Campbell, and allow him to serve only as a recruiter and keep him safe stateside.
How would you feel if your son or daughter was graduating from West Point, and was deployed, while this guy was kept stateside ? Why should he get preferential treatment ?
I'm really torn on this one.....but lean towards not letting him out of his service. He signed his letter of intent to serve as a real officer, not as a recruiter, which is usually done by an NCO in his later years (I think) or by reserve officers, not full timers. His education was paid for by my taxes, and he will be making a pile, as an NFL player. Should he be required to pay back the worth of his education if he does in fact not serve ?
As an Army grad he is supposed to be committed to 5 years of service to our country as an officer in the Army. There was every chance he would serve overseas and specifically in harms way in Iraq & Afganistan. However the Army has said they may make an exception for Campbell, and allow him to serve only as a recruiter and keep him safe stateside.
How would you feel if your son or daughter was graduating from West Point, and was deployed, while this guy was kept stateside ? Why should he get preferential treatment ?
I'm really torn on this one.....but lean towards not letting him out of his service. He signed his letter of intent to serve as a real officer, not as a recruiter, which is usually done by an NCO in his later years (I think) or by reserve officers, not full timers. His education was paid for by my taxes, and he will be making a pile, as an NFL player. Should he be required to pay back the worth of his education if he does in fact not serve ?