Can't Argue with Peter King's take on last nights game | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Can't Argue with Peter King's take on last nights game

gfish24

Rookie
☠️ Banned ☠️
Joined
Feb 24, 2008
Messages
2,909
Reaction score
3,806
Location
Norfolk, Ontario, Canada
Except for one play, I absolutely loved Miami's approach to the Monday night game against the Colts. Reminded me of the way the man who put all the Dolphins' pieces in place, VP of football operations Bill Parcells, positioned the Giants to play the Super Bowl against Buffalo 19 seasons ago.
The Giants had just shocked the 49ers in the NFC Championship Game in San Francisco and were boarding buses for the flight back east. Parcells, playing with a backup quarterback and no scary offensive weapons, knew they'd have to face the best offense in football, Buffalo's, in the Super Bowl. He looked across the aisle of the bus at offensive coordinator Ron Erhardt and said to him, "Shorten the game.''
To Parcells, Dan Henning is now his Ron Erhardt. Chad Pennington is the smart, efficient and accurate quarterback who knows how to bleed the play clock down. And Miami bled the clock just the way it wanted Monday night; the Colts had the ball for just 3:07 in the first quarter, 6:25 in the second and 1:30 in the third. That's right -- three plays and 90 seconds in one quarter, sandwiched around 11- and 13-play Miami drives.
But even a plan this intelligently neo-conservative needs some guts, and Henning's ultra-safe call with 4:33 left in a 20-20 game was just plain wrong. Miami had the ball at Indy's 30. Third-and-six. Be Henning for a second. Think.
• If the Dolphins convert here, they get to cut more time off the clock, and maybe the Colts have to start using their three timeouts, and maybe Peyton Manning gets the ball back with less than two minutes left, needing a field goal or touchdown to tie or win. Or, if the Dolphins can get two more first downs before kicking a field goal or scoring a touchdown, the clock could bleed down to zero and Miami will have won without letting Manning have another possession.
• Think of the previous third-and-five-yards-or-longer snaps for the Dolphins. In inverse order, here are the five in the second half that preceded this playcall: Third-and-seven, 21-yard pass to Ted Ginn; first down. Third-and-five, 15-yard pass to Ginn; first down. Third-and-six, seven-yard pass to Ginn; first down. Third-and-seven, incomplete pass to Ronnie Brown. Third-and-five, 10-yard pass to Ginn; first down. All five were passes. Pennington completed four of them, all first-down conversions.
• If Pennington throws an incompletion, kicker Dan Carpenter has a 48-yard field-goal attempt. Carpenter's a second-year kicker; his career-long is 50, and so far on the evening, he's hit 45- and 44-yard kicks and missed wide-right on a 49-yarder. Running but not converting the third down could make it a slightly shorter kick.
Henning called for a run by Brown behind the left side of the line, behind guard Justin Smiley and franchise tackle Jake Long. But the play gained only three yards. Miami settled for a Carpenter field goal from 45 yards out to take a 23-20 lead with 3:55 to play.
An eternity for Manning.
It took Manning 32 seconds to go 80 yards, thanks to the 48-yard catch-and-run by Pierre Garcon, the replacement for Anthony Gonzalez. That made it 27-23, and the Dolphins couldn't score in the last 3:18, so that was the final.
Just as I have to believe Erhardt would have let Jeff Hostetler try to hit Ottis Anderson in the flat or Mark Ingram on a short curl in a similar situation 19 years ago, I have to think Henning is kicking himself today. He has to be. You have one of the play-it-safest quarterbacks in recent times behind center, and you don't choose to put the ball in his hands. Instead, you choose to put the ball in Manning's hands, with enough time for him to score three times. A big, big mistake.
A year ago, Miami started 0-2 but rebounded to win 11 of its last 14 and win the AFC East. The difference between then and now: The Dolphins had the Wildcat to unveil, and used it to help whip the Patriots and Chargers in the next two games. What element of surprise does this team have now? A year ago, Miami had the soft midsection of a schedule (Buffalo, Denver, Seattle, Oakland) to run off a winning streak. Now, in the next six games, it has: at San Diego, Buffalo, Jets, Saints, at Jets, at New England. Can the Dolphins go 4-2 against that slate to right the ship and get in playoff contention? I'm thinking no.


Read more: http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2009/writers/peter_king/09/22/mail/index.html#ixzz0RrgBsLQJ


King is spot on in his analysis
 
BP: "Oh...and Paul"....


....."show the defense where Landshark Stadium is"....
 
Spot on...Henning and Sparano choked. Listen to Pennington's post game comments.
 
The Giants had just shocked the 49ers in the NFC Championship Game in San Francisco

The comparison flopped right there. That Giants team, with a backup quarterback, was good enough to defeat the 2-time defending Super Bowl champion 49ers in San Francisco, battering Montana.

New York's defense was superb, in the top 5 of virtually every category. I remember that because I was betting future odds heavily in those days, and the most relevant stats were not well known, unlike today in the internet age.

Frankly, I always thought Parcells got too much credit for that 1990 Super Bowl win. The Giants were 15-3 for the season, with terrific players including a core who had been on the '86 title team. New York was superior to Buffalo and only the fear factor, and Buffalo wrongly placed as a 7 point favorite, made the win stand out.

Keep in mind that Super Bowl was played with only a 1 week gap after the conference championship games, not the typical 2. I always thought New York would have wrecked Buffalo if Parcells and Belichick had been given more time, the standard 2 weeks. In fact, a year later than was one of my principal arguments as guest on Las Vegas radio sports talk shows, that the Redskins would batter Buffalo since the Bills were overrated a year earlier, losing a tight game when the physical gap between the two teams in the trenches was not close. Same thing the next two years vs. Dallas. Buffalo was actually fortunate it had a chance in one of the games.
 
When are we going to have a no guts no glory play caller.. All these safe play calls make me puke.

Stop playing not to lose. PLAY TO WIN GOD DAMMIT!
 
I hate to say that I agree with Peter King on this one. It wasn't just this play though. Everytime we got 3rd and managable in field goal range, except for the drive where Fasano and Ginn dropped the TD's, Henning decided to run it.
 
Back
Top Bottom