Tua and Hill's grades are monsters. Funny thing is this is going to be the Waddle game.Here’s a quick look at PFF scores for both teams going into Sunday’s game.
Sorry for the blurry image.
View attachment 124883View attachment 124884
I'd actually be curious to see how our line graded out in the games Tua didn't play in compared to the games he did. The eye test for me is that he makes the line so much better when he plays. But I have no numbers to back that opinion up.I dig this layout, thanks for posting.
On paper, our OL actually looks AMAZING. That's kinda funny.
Armstead played 12% of the offensive snaps in the Jets game before leaving with an injury. He proceeded to miss the following week vs the Vikings. He played 49% of the offensive snaps vs Houston before leaving the game with an injury. He missed last week and is a question mark for Sunday.I'd actually be curious to see how our line graded out in the games Tua didn't play in compared to the games he did. The eye test for me is that he makes the line so much better when he plays. But I have no numbers to back that opinion up.
I know all this, and knew somebody would point it out, but I'm still curious to see the lines grades with Tua under center compared to Teddy two gloves and Skylar.Armstead played 12% of the offensive snaps in the Jets game before leaving with an injury. He proceeded to miss the following week vs the Vikings. He played 49% of the offensive snaps vs Houston before leaving the game with an injury. He missed last week and is a question mark for Sunday.
The team is worse when Tua doesn’t play for sure. That being said, the OL play is exponentially better when Armstead is on the field. Tua’s “struggles” the past 2 games literally started as soon as Armstead was hurt in Houston.
I guess my point was that our backups took the majority of their snaps vs the Jets, Vikings and Texans with Armstead injured. I’m sure Tua has more poise and pocket awareness than Teddy or Skylar meaning getting the ball out quicker/less hits or sacks. It’s just a tough metric to measure when our OL plays poorly when Armstead is out AND our backup QBs are in.I know all this, and knew somebody would point it out, but I'm still curious to see the lines grades with Tua under center compared to Teddy two gloves and Skylar.
It is a tough one to neasure. Do you know how the line graded out in the 2nd half of the Bungles game, I'm pretty sure Armstead played every snap in that game?I guess my point was that our backups took the majority of their snaps vs the Jets, Vikings and Texans with Armstead injured. I’m sure Tua has more poise and pocket awareness than Teddy or Skylar meaning getting the ball out quicker/less hits or sacks. It’s just a tough metric to measure when our OL plays poorly when Armstead is out AND our backup QBs are in.