Chargers looking to trade out. Hold third overall pick.

[malzacher]

When Miami moved up from 12 to 3 for Dion Jordan they gave up a believe a third round pick. Chargers hold the third overall pick this year and there's chatter that San Diego is looking to move back. Is a third enough? And would you want Miami to pull the trigger? Who gets drafted? Ramsay?

 

[JakeMcAwful]

We gave a second to move up with Oakland, I'm guessing it'll cost more considering Ramsey and Tunsil will be there at 3.

 

[AquaXI]

No thank you. Last time was a 2nd and this time might be a 2nd and a 3rd. Like I said no thanks.

 

[TopOfTheWorld]

We gave a second to move up with Oakland, I'm guessing it'll cost more considering Ramsey and Tunsil will be there at 3.

Yep, A LOT more. Also, Myles jack. #3 is a great spot to trade down this year, if you are looking for value.

---------- Post added at 01:26 AM ---------- Previous post was at 01:25 AM ----------

No thank you. Last time was a 2nd and this time might be a 2nd and a 3rd. Like I said no thanks.

I think it would cost even more than that this year. So few blue chip prospects right now.

 

[Gonzo]

No thank you. Last time was a 2nd and this time might be a 2nd and a 3rd. Like I said no thanks.

The cost wasn't bad, the pick was. As bad as Tannenbum is, he's no Jeff Ireland. I'd absolutely give up a 2nd for Ramsey without a second thought. And while I hate drafting cornfed, I wouldn't lose any sleep over landing Tunsil either. At least I wouldn't have to hear about that goddamn position for another 10 years (assuming we actually start re-signing our talent).

 

[Sons Of Shula]

The cost wasn't bad, the pick was. As bad as Tannenbum is, he's no Jeff Ireland. I'd absolutely give up a 2nd for Ramsey without a second thought. And while I hate drafting cornfed, I wouldn't lose any sleep over landing Tunsil either. At least I wouldn't have to hear about that goddamn position for another 10 years (assuming we actually start re-signing our talent).

In a heartbeat. I have little doubt he'll be the next playmaking game-changing safety in the likes of a Reed, Polamalu, Berry mold so to speak.

 

[AquaXI]

Yep, A LOT more. Also, Myles jack. #3 is a great spot to trade down this year, if you are looking for value.

---------- Post added at 01:26 AM ---------- Previous post was at 01:25 AM ----------



I think it would cost even more than that this year. So few blue chip prospects right now.

Your right it actually cost like 2 2nd rounders since 13-3 move up is a difference of 1050 points.

---------- Post added at 08:00 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:59 PM ----------

The cost wasn't bad, the pick was. As bad as Tannenbum is, he's no Jeff Ireland. I'd absolutely give up a 2nd for Ramsey without a second thought. And while I hate drafting cornfed, I wouldn't lose any sleep over landing Tunsil either. At least I wouldn't have to hear about that goddamn position for another 10 years (assuming we actually start re-signing our talent).

I'm with you if it was just a 2nd. Unfortunately this time they will want much more. Difference in points from 3 to 13 is 1050.

 

[Aqua Shadow]

The draft pick value chart is an outdated system that doesn't take in to account talent from year to year.

Not to bash anyone who uses it as it is a good start to defining the value in a numerical sense but there is more to it year to year.

I doubt either the titans or browns got their full value according to the chart (could be wrong and will check) but the idea of talent at a need position at the top of the draft compared to the later options was a big gap to those teams front offices.

Sent from my SM-S820L using Tapatalk

 

[cash]

The draft pick value chart is an outdated system that doesn't take in to account talent from year to year.

Not to bash anyone who uses it as it is a good start to defining the value in a numerical sense but there is more to it year to year.

I doubt either the titans or browns got their full value according to the chart (could be wrong and will check) but the idea of talent at a need position at the top of the draft compared to the later options was a big gap to those teams front offices.

Sent from my SM-S820L using Tapatalk

Not everyone has an eye for talent...Only reason I could ever imagine someone using a pick point chart. Never in my life.

 

[LordTua]

If we traded up to 3 it'd be mixed emotions on my end. I'd be ecstatic to get Ramsey, Jack or Tunsil ...but the cost would make me very sad

 

[malzacher]

Damn I was thinking we only have up a 3 tie whole time. Ramsay would be fun to see in our secondary m.

 

[BlueFin]

We gave a second to move up with Oakland, I'm guessing it'll cost more considering Ramsey and Tunsil will be there at 3.

A top half of the round 2nd....set this team back big time.

You make that deal you better be getting an elite difference maker.

 

[Irishfinfan1]

If you are open to taking the last of Tunsil, Jack and Ramsey then really it is just into the top 5 you need to trade, people keep talking about us needed to get difference makers rather than either flunking the draft or just getting solid players. Our 1st and 2nd for one of Tunsil, Jack or Ramsay is something you would have to consider.

 

[uk_dolfan]

Way too high unless we want Ramsey

We need a week 1 starter in round 2, cant give that up

 

[NorFlaFin]

In a heartbeat. I have little doubt he'll be the next playmaking game-changing safety in the likes of a Reed, Polamalu, Berry mold so to speak.

The cost wasn't bad, the pick was. As bad as Tannenbum is, he's no Jeff Ireland. I'd absolutely give up a 2nd for Ramsey without a second thought. And while I hate drafting cornfed, I wouldn't lose any sleep over landing Tunsil either. At least I wouldn't have to hear about that goddamn position for another 10 years (assuming we actually start re-signing our talent).

Agree Ramsey is closest thing to sure-fit blue chipper in this draft.