Clabo say he's ready if needed | Page 2 | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Clabo say he's ready if needed

Whew Im glad he is ready now we have another tackle that is no worth a damn
 
If he does play there better be no empty backfield sets. We will need both Clay and Thomas back there to block on passing downs.
 
I think we could line up 5 traffic cones to protect our qb better
 
AXAFinFan said:
That could work... has that ever been done before? We could set a precedent!

I guess if they didn't put an orange cone in place of Columbo, it's probably against the rules.
Click to expand...

Damn, I was going to say orange street cone. You beat me to it lol.
 
Nobody on this line should even spectate at the pro bowl this season
 
should of cut him then he wouldn't be an option...make this staff stop going with whats familiar and flat out failing
 
hooshoops said:
should of cut him then he wouldn't be an option...make this staff stop going with whats familiar and flat out failing
Click to expand...

Why cut him its not like the other tackles we have are that good either. I think Martin can improve but in reality I dont think any tackle on this team will be starting for us next year.
 
dlockz said:
Why cut him its not like the other tackles we have are that good either. I think Martin can improve but in reality I dont think any tackle on this team will be starting for us next year.
Click to expand...

cause if clabo plays as we all have seen you are done...he's toast...lose the dead weight...i'd rather lose with a garner or yeatman and see what they got to offer than with a corpse and clabo is that
 
hooshoops said:
cause if clabo plays as we all have seen you are done...he's toast...lose the dead weight...i'd rather lose with a garner or yeatman and see what they got to offer than with a corpse and clabo is that
Click to expand...

Well in reality if Yeatman or Garner were good we wouldnt be trading for A washed up McKinnie
I never get this argument of seeing what guys offer when they have played in games and are evaluated every year in training camp and daily in practice.
They had a whole year in the system with Philben and yet we went out and signed Clabo because they didnt like what they saw.
Noone seemed to use that argument when we had Pat White. These guys couldnt earn playing time over a h0rrible Clabo and were not deemed good enough to replace him with.
It not like an available McKinnie was too good to be true and you cannot pass on that kind of player.
These coaches showed they have no qualms about moving a guy or benching him because they just did that. There is plenty of dead weight at tackle.
All Yeatman seems to be good for is a position change every year.

Im just saying if these guys were that good wouldnt they be impressing somebody in practice.
 
I think we always seem to ovesimplify the line when we give up a bunch of sacks. Clabo was on bench this week and we still gave up six sacks.
Its not just a simple matter of well Clabo is the only one who sucks and replacing him its all good
 
I need my lawn cut if Clabo wants to do that.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom