LOL you said check mate! ahahahha
:lol2::sidelol::sidelol:
ahahhaha, ****ing David Caruso over here!
momo
AHAHAHAHA OMG SO FUNNY!
david ***ing Chappel over here!!
aww he used little smiley faces...how cute!
Conspiracy Theory...
- Thread starter Jeep
- Start date
AHAHAHAHA OMG SO FUNNY!
david ***ing Chappel over here!!
aww he used little smiley faces...how cute!
I was just talking about this... Even though that season was absolutely terrible with Cleo Lemon. I'd rather watch that season again than this sad excuse of one. At least then they actually tried to win games. This season is just pathetic and effortless in the worst way possible. I thought with Henne out of the picture we might actually have a chance. But they totally screw it up still because there's absolutely no talent or motivation for them to even win freakin' game.
The Confessor
Doesnt play well with others
The no-call on Revis in the endzone was as subtle as flying jets into two large buildings. Even bigger question is, why he gets away with that on every single play. Anytime they are "Showcasing" how physical and amazing he is, you see the EXACT same thing, he holds on to the jersey like a girl.
There have been many events over the years that have made me ask the exact same question. Seems that certain teams ALWAYS seem to be the beneficiary of particular plays-
Steelers:
Immaculate reception- I have seen that probably 40 times, and every single time, it almost looks staged the way the camera's don't ever show the entire path the ball took.
Raplisburger- First in the Seattle Superbowl, where he was obviously feet short of the goal-line, but they called it a TD. He suggested after the game he was surprised.
The phantom Offensive holding when Hasselbeck completed the go-ahead pass down to the Stillers 4. They showed, re-showed, and re-showed the play again from every angle. There was ZERO holding anywhere along the line, and that's actually a rarity cause there is holding on 95% of the plays, just not many are called.
Of course when he was fumbled on the 2 last year, it was VERY clearly captured, and was a touchback for us. It then came out that the guy that made the call was a Lifelong Stillers fan and lived right outside of Putzburgh? WTF
Cheatriots- Too many instances to post, but the tuck rule is a good place to start.
I'm not saying there is indeed a conpsiracy going on, but there is LOTS of circumstances that makes me wonder......
There have been many events over the years that have made me ask the exact same question. Seems that certain teams ALWAYS seem to be the beneficiary of particular plays-
Steelers:
Immaculate reception- I have seen that probably 40 times, and every single time, it almost looks staged the way the camera's don't ever show the entire path the ball took.
Raplisburger- First in the Seattle Superbowl, where he was obviously feet short of the goal-line, but they called it a TD. He suggested after the game he was surprised.
The phantom Offensive holding when Hasselbeck completed the go-ahead pass down to the Stillers 4. They showed, re-showed, and re-showed the play again from every angle. There was ZERO holding anywhere along the line, and that's actually a rarity cause there is holding on 95% of the plays, just not many are called.
Of course when he was fumbled on the 2 last year, it was VERY clearly captured, and was a touchback for us. It then came out that the guy that made the call was a Lifelong Stillers fan and lived right outside of Putzburgh? WTF
Cheatriots- Too many instances to post, but the tuck rule is a good place to start.
I'm not saying there is indeed a conpsiracy going on, but there is LOTS of circumstances that makes me wonder......