could this posibility work out for us ?

[maverick50]

i vce been thinking and i dont think we need as near as many olinmen as it once looked like , therefore I as the big cohoona would like us to use free agency to address our secondary and one olineman this way we can concentrate our draft on the following positions.

rd 1 draft lb patrick willis
rd 2 a draft c kalil
rd2 b draft qb kolb
rd 3 draft wr ( the best that we can get )
rd 4 draft cb quincy black
rd 6 draft another qb maybe zach taylor.
rd 6b draft wr d'juan woods
rd 7 draft a dt .

then we could fix other area next draft. how about trading ricky williams for wr roy williams . then we trade lemon to the texans and get sage back , ( kidding )

 

[Agent51]

i vce been thinking and i dont think we need as near as many olinmen as it once looked like , therefore I as the big cohoona would like us to use free agency to address our secondary and one olineman this way we can concentrate our draft on the following positions.

rd 1 draft lb patrick willis
rd 2 a draft c kalil
rd2 b draft qb kolb
rd 3 draft wr ( the best that we can get )
rd 4 draft cb quincy black
rd 6 draft another qb maybe zach taylor.
rd 6b draft wr d'juan woods
rd 7 draft a dt .

then we could fix other area next draft. how about trading ricky williams for wr roy williams . then we trade lemon to the texans and get sage back , ( kidding )

:confused:

So wait, you want us to find DBs and OLs in free agency, magically, out of nowhere, since we haven't found any there yet, and instead draft TWO QBs? And 2 WRs when we already have Chambers, Booker, Hagan, and Hakim from free agency? Where's the young TE to backup David Martin?

This draft just makes no sense. No offense to you, I'm just wondering where your logic is coming from here, to draft 2 QBs and 2 WRs instead of one of each and focus on other positions we need help/depth at. And as far as your FA plan, if there were worthwhile guys out there, we would have gone after them already.

 

[Geforce]

i vce been thinking and i dont think we need as near as many olinmen as it once looked like , therefore I as the big cohoona would like us to use free agency to address our secondary and one olineman this way we can concentrate our draft on the following positions.

rd 1 draft lb patrick willis
rd 2 a draft c kalil
rd2 b draft qb kolb
rd 3 draft wr ( the best that we can get )
rd 4 draft cb quincy black
rd 6 draft another qb maybe zach taylor.
rd 6b draft wr d'juan woods
rd 7 draft a dt .

then we could fix other area next draft. how about trading ricky williams for wr roy williams . then we trade lemon to the texans and get sage back , ( kidding )

Well it's doubtful Kalil will fall to #40 in the draft with teams like Oakland, Cleveland and Tampa Bay needing a center. With Kolb impressing so many during his workouts, I also doubt he'll last that long.

*Why not trade Ricky Williams to Houston for Andre Johnson. They need a running back and we need a wide receiver.*

 

[AllianceCollect]

Honestly, it wouldn't surprise me at all if we pick 2 QBs in this draft, an early guy to groom & a very late project kinda guy. Muller is known for his project QBs

 

[Agent51]

Honestly, it wouldn't surprise me at all if we pick 2 QBs in this draft, an early guy to groom & a very late project kinda guy. Muller is known for his project QBs

Then we waste 2 picks on a position where only one can start? So the guy we pick to groom works out, what happens to the project guy? They will be the same age so it's not like one will be there when the other retires (for a significant amout of time anyway) so I fail to see the point in taking 2 guys (in the same year anyway).

 

[BONG SHULA]

Well it's doubtful Kalil will fall to #40 in the draft with teams like Oakland, Cleveland and Tampa Bay needing a center. With Kolb impressing so many during his workouts, I also doubt he'll last that long.

*Why not trade Ricky Williams to Houston for Andre Johnson. They need a running back and we need a wide receiver.*

Hey I have a better idea, lets trade Ricky for Tom Brady, then we won't have to draft Quinn. I think I might call up Mr. Cameron right now.

 

[nyital571]

When is willis gunna play?

 

[Crump]

ill take aundrae allison in the 3rd, but we dont need 2 qbs in the draft. let lemon and kolb (if thats the route we go) battle it out for the number 2 positionj behind culpepper. if culp doesnt pan out we dont need to rely on two inexperienced qbs. and whatever reciever we get in 2nd or 3rd will solidify the depth chart we dont need an additional, maybe 7th round camp fodder or a speed demon UFA

 

[Myles Fynch]

Honestly, it wouldn't surprise me at all if we pick 2 QBs in this draft, an early guy to groom & a very late project kinda guy. Muller is known for his project QBs

I'd support that... take one day one, take another on day two. We all know that QBs can be a crapshoot in the draft... if QB is a problem for us (and it is, both at starter and for depth) we need to hedge our bets. That's the point of stockpiling picks... so you can reduce the risk of busting out on a position where you really need help.

Case in point: 1994... Heath Shuler #3 overall, Gus Ferrotte #197 overall. It's doubtful Washington thought they needed "Shuler insurance" at the time, but taking a flyer on Gus late paid off very well for them.

 

[Finsfan1984]

Even though Im high on Willis, you want to draft a LB in 1st who isnt gonna play? Draft 2 QB's to develope in one draft? Dont see any of this dude!

 

[Finsfan1984]

I'd support that... take one day one, take another on day two. We all know that QBs can be a crapshoot in the draft... if QB is a problem for us (and it is, both at starter and for depth) we need to hedge our bets. That's the point of stockpiling picks... so you can reduce the risk of busting out on a position where you really need help.

Case in point: 1994... Heath Shuler #3 overall, Gus Ferrotte #197 overall. It's doubtful Washington thought they needed "Shuler insurance" at the time, but taking a flyer on Gus late paid off very well for them.

We already have one young developmental QB in Lemon, and you want to draft 2 more? I think this is non-sense, just cant happen. Yes we need a young QB in the draft, and i want us to get one, ONE being the thing here. We simply have too many other needs though to draft 2 QB's. What do you suggest, that we have 4 QB's on the opening day roster, with Cpep or Green as 1, Lemon as 2, and rookie QB as 3, and the other rookie QB as 4? Just how do you suppose we keep all these guys, and furthermore, how can we develope 3 young QB's? You cant even do that on MADDEN for crying out loud!