ANUFan
Club Member
I'm curious for those that are super critical of Gase and the Dolphins. Do you ever look at other teams around the league for perspective? I didn't say excuses but legitimate perspective. For example, the Dolphins to date have a better or tied record with the following teams
Arizona Cardinals
4 6
Cincinnati Bengals
4 6
Houston Texans
4 6
New York Jets
4 6
Oakland Raiders
4 6
Tampa Bay Buccaneers
4 6
Chicago Bears
3 7
Denver Broncos
3 7
Indianapolis Colts
3 7
New York Giants
2 9
San Francisco 49ers
1 9
Cleveland Browns
0 10
The Majority of these teams have had their starting QB since day 1. Obviously, some have lost their starting QB for a period of time (Recently Texans and Tampa).
But when you take a look at some of the highlighted teams it's mind-boggling. Weren't the Raiders suppose to win it all this year?(maybe they still can) How many names did they sign to that team in the offseason? Weren't they considered to have the best QB and O-line in the league? What happened?
Didn't the Giants last offseason buy just about every missing defensive piece including one OV from the Dolphins? Touted as having the best D-line and one of the best core LB and secondary back-fields? Moreover, they still have Eli and before the recent loss of Beckham just about all their offensive weapons. What's their excuse?
Here are the teams that are 1 game better than our Dolphins
Baltimore Ravens
5 5
Buffalo Bills
5 5
Green Bay Packers
5 5
Dallas Cowboys
5 6
Los Angeles Chargers
5 6
Washington Redskins
5 6
Once more I'm not making excuses for this team BUT perspective goes a long way. Seriously folks look at the names on the list I posted. The Cowboys, GB are going DOWN! Think about what players and units they have compared to our players and units.
Yes! We can get into semantics looking at strength of schedule blah blah blah. But sometimes you have to give credit when it's due. Yes, we aren't world beaters but we sure aren't as bad with what we have as some are claiming.
Arizona Cardinals
4 6
Cincinnati Bengals
4 6
Houston Texans
4 6
New York Jets
4 6
Oakland Raiders
4 6
Tampa Bay Buccaneers
4 6
Chicago Bears
3 7
Denver Broncos
3 7
Indianapolis Colts
3 7
New York Giants
2 9
San Francisco 49ers
1 9
Cleveland Browns
0 10
The Majority of these teams have had their starting QB since day 1. Obviously, some have lost their starting QB for a period of time (Recently Texans and Tampa).
But when you take a look at some of the highlighted teams it's mind-boggling. Weren't the Raiders suppose to win it all this year?(maybe they still can) How many names did they sign to that team in the offseason? Weren't they considered to have the best QB and O-line in the league? What happened?
Didn't the Giants last offseason buy just about every missing defensive piece including one OV from the Dolphins? Touted as having the best D-line and one of the best core LB and secondary back-fields? Moreover, they still have Eli and before the recent loss of Beckham just about all their offensive weapons. What's their excuse?
Here are the teams that are 1 game better than our Dolphins
Baltimore Ravens
5 5
Buffalo Bills
5 5
Green Bay Packers
5 5
Dallas Cowboys
5 6
Los Angeles Chargers
5 6
Washington Redskins
5 6
Once more I'm not making excuses for this team BUT perspective goes a long way. Seriously folks look at the names on the list I posted. The Cowboys, GB are going DOWN! Think about what players and units they have compared to our players and units.
Yes! We can get into semantics looking at strength of schedule blah blah blah. But sometimes you have to give credit when it's due. Yes, we aren't world beaters but we sure aren't as bad with what we have as some are claiming.
Last edited: