So the fact that Revis had great coverage and was probably intercepting that ball is irrelevant? You're a funny guy.
It is irrelevant, Lee Evans scored a touchdown.
So the fact that Revis had great coverage and was probably intercepting that ball is irrelevant? You're a funny guy.
Why the hell would the Jets put Cromartie on Marshall when they have the best cornerback in the world? Revis will be on him all day and he will get physical with him at the LOS just like he did with Andre Johnson.
That was also with Mangini's bull**** defense.
It is irrelevant, Lee Evans scored a touchdown.
I didn't even read Juncs post(s) and still haven't. I was responding to the OP.BillParFan said:I expect better from you but you don't get it, do you.
I just turned Junkies BS around on him and all you can post is a lame BS excuse?
Go read his TWO statements again before making excuses for Junky.
Why the hell would the Jets put Cromartie on Marshall when they have the best cornerback in the world? Revis will be on him all day and he will get physical with him at the LOS just like he did with Andre Johnson.
That was also with Mangini's bull**** defense.
When did u trade for Nhamdi?
I'm trying to decide whether you're actually as foolish as you're coming across or if you're just a big homer. It's irrelevant in the context of who won or lost the game. It's entirely relevant in discussing how good Revis was or was not covering Evans, which of course, was the point you were attempting to make.
Revis had perfect coverage and was about to pick the ball off before his out of control team mate barreled into him giving Evans an opportunity to take the ball and run.
I didn't even read Juncs post(s) and still haven't. I was responding to the OP.
And your excuse for the Ginn burn job is?....................
If he's better, then why doesn't he follow the #1 receiver around? Where did I say Revis didn't get burned by Ginn? No where.He isnt as good as Revass, he's better. Nhamdi didnt get burned by scrub Ted Ginn Jr, and all you Jests fans can sit there saying it wasnt Revis assignment til your blue in the face. Revis never broke stride to sit down in a shallow zone, he was a step behind Ginn from the snap.
No excuse, Ginn burned him. I suppose you think that him getting burned one time means he's not great?
What does that have to do with your ridiculous argument about the Lee Evans play?