Some articles in the Media and some posts here have heavily criticized GM, Chris Grier. As I have said in multiple posts that the #1 job of a GM is to put together a talented Roster which most, if not all, independent Media agrees that Grier has done that. But I wanted to take a deeper look at the Roster construction. In my opinion, there are three layers – Draft, Trades and Free Agency – in building a Roster. Grier has done well in Trades like the Tunsil trade, #3 pick T. Lance trade, Tyreek Hill trade, Jalen Ramsey trade, etc. He and his front office have done a good job in Free Agency as well – getting good players below market values, such as Jonnu S., A. Brewer, J. Brooks, Calais C., T. Armstead ($15M/yr was below market value for a top 5 OT), etc.
The third piece – Draft, Develop and Retain – is where we have underperformed in my opinion when it comes to starting level Players and that separates us from the real contenders. I went to ESPN.Com and followed their Depth Chart to come up with the following Table. I included the top teams like BUF, BAL, HOU, bottom teams like NYG, NO, JAG, and middling teams like Miami, ARZ, CIN, DEN. I didn’t include GB, KC, PIT and DET – top Teams that we know draft very well. The Depth Chart is a total of 24 Starters including FB and Nickel Back. I excluded Special Teams in the Study. On the current ESPN Depth Chart, Miami scores 9 out of 24 for Starters that Miami has drafted including L. Eichenberg and 3 UDFA (Benito J., Kahou and S. Duck) but ESPN has listed Chop Robinson, one of the top Pass Rushers in the NFL, and Patrick Paul as the backups. So even if we add them, that still makes only 11 out of 24. I do realize worse Teams than Miami like NYG have more drafted Starters on the current Roster than Miami so there may not be a direct correlation between winning and drafted Starters but having 9 or 11 seems pretty low in the age of salary cap and then the top teams predominantly built on drafted Starters gives a strong validity to the argument/correlation between the two.
So is the issue in Miami in the drafting process or developing the Players drafted (which would be on the Coaching staff) or retaining the drafted Players? Just going back the last 3 years, we have not been able to retain some good draft picks either – Wilkins, Hunt, Brandon Jones, Raekwon Davis, Holland – first two were overpaid. Relying on Free Agency to fill gaps has it’s own downfalls – chemistry issues, fit, injury prone players to get below market prices, continuity issues, etc.
We need to fix the Draft, Develop & Retain process to sustain any kind of Playoff success. Good news is that Chop R., Paul, M. Washington for a #3 or #4 WR and J. Wright flashing potential seem like a good start going forward. Coming draft is going to be huge for us in filling the DL, CB, S and G holes on our Roster.
View attachment 186202
Good points. I think you're headed in the right direction.
Those who focus their criticism on blaming Chris Grier for a lack of vision & execution really miss the big picture. Fact is, he's actually quite good at a lot of what he's attempting to do.
I think it's very clear the Dolphins have a problem, but it's far larger than 1 person...
...the problem is conflicting visions.
Firstly, Ross has an agenda which is mainly focused on finding the next Shula and/or Marino. He sees HC and QB as a means to stability. He's chased several coaches and ultimately burned through several hires of his own. Meanwhile, he's done everything he can to invest in the QBs he's had, probably more than they deserve TBH.
So that's where it starts. But there are the other factors as well.
The HCs that have been hired were all
first-time guys entering what may be their one and only shot at being an NFL HC. As such, they've tried their best to focus on whatever priorities they see as being best. Gase and McDaniel both clearly prioritized the relationships they had with their QBs. Flores on the other hand, prioritized a culture of discipline and accountability.
I think it's fair to say that in the midst of all that, Grier has genuinely tried to make things work. He's been active in FA. He's been bold on several occasions. He's made sure not to miss on high-value draft selections: Minkah, Wilkins, Tua, Waddle, etc. He's worked with his HCs to deliver the kinds of players those HCs wanted.
While drafting and trading tend to bring in the kind of player types the schemes demand, the spending has generally reflected the HCs input, too. The Flores teams spent mostly on
defense: Kyle Van Noy, Xavien Howard, Byron Jones, etc. The McDaniel teams have spent quite a bit on
offense: Hill, Armstead, Waddle, Tua, etc.
Point is, Grier has been adaptive. And we continue to hear that during each cycle of HC hiring, that the Leadership within the team wants someone who will work towards a shared vision.
Grier's not instituting his own vision. He's trying to perform as well as he can while working between an Owner and a string of HCs who all have their own priorities while somehow trying to make sure his own moves make sense in some larger schema where he's following a list of 'best practices' for NFL GMs avoiding huge payouts and maintaining a good relationship with other teams.
We must therefore understand the Dolphins as a tangled web of conflicting visions.
And as I continually remind people, if the Owner hasn't yet found a way during the last 15 years to put all the power in the hands of a single man, he's unlikely to do that in the future. The safe bet is that things continue in this tangled way.
The best thing the Dolphins might've done IMHO was to have avoided the whole "tank" thing and just kept Laremy Tunsil who was about the only good thing our OL had really seen since Jake Long in '08. We could've moved on from Gase after the '18 season and used '19 to not only add Flores, Minkah and Wilkins (as well as Fitzmagic at QB) to see us through but we would've been in position in '20 to draft a QB no matter where we were.
We were 7-9 in Gase's last year and we know Flores had a positive impact in '19. Let's imagine had we not tanked that we might've been somewhere around .500 in Flores' first year with Minkah, Van Noy, Wilkins, Tunsil and Fitzmagic all contributing at reasonable levels.
So, perhaps we would've entered the '20 draft looking for a QB with something like the #15 overall pick.
Either Tua would've fallen because of his injury and we would've gotten him all the same. Or perhaps we might've traded up slightly and made a play for either he or Herbert. That would've worked fine. Or we would've had no problem grabbing Jordan Love at #15 who didn't go until #25 that year anyway. Or we even could've ended up with Jalen Hurts who's had a marvelous career. All of those QBs would've still been available to us in some way, shape or form.
I can't stress enough either how much the job of Leadership is to make sure people are on the same page. Minkah demanded a trade but the job of Leadership is to make sure that whatever schematic separation there might've been between HC Brian Flores and DB Minkah Fitzpatrick doesn't get resolved by sending a Pro Bowl player away.
Sending Minkah to Pittsburgh was
NOT the solution and it's moves like that which show the lack of leadership in Miami.
More to the point, Tua shouldn't have been the pick if Flores wasn't on board. And Flores shouldn't have been the HC hired if he wasn't on board with the Front Office's strategy of tanking.
There was conflict all over the place.
Ultimately, tanking was stupid and we never should've done it. I said at the time it felt dumb and I stand by that. Teams that do silly things leaning into reactionary, impulsive strategies usually pay the price just as we have.
If you simply put one foot in front of the other and make solid decisions that are actually in everyone's best interest (instead of having everyone fighting for their own conflicting interest) you end up alright.
Instead, we tanked because we didn't trust a QB would be there which they ultimately always are for good, solid teams who don't need a Top-5 pick to secure a functional QB.
The tank pushed players away and Ross' tampering led to Flores leaving. And instead of giving him the QB he wanted, we forced someone on him he didn't like and who has ultimately proven problematic for another set of reasons.
There's an alternative universe where the Dolphins, still led by HC Brian Flores, were a tough-but-smart, defensive team with players like Zach Seiler, Christian Wilkins and Minkah Fitzpatrick complimenting a functional offense with Laremy Tunsil and Jordan Love.
You don't have to believe the whimsical scenario above is something we should've ended up with. Flores was a jerk and perhaps things would've fallen apart all the same. Perhaps Jordan Love would've failed here rather than becoming the guy he was in GB?
You only need to acknowledge that the alternative path was there and that we found a way to make it
MUCH more complicated.
If you see that your past decisions were motivated by bad things, like the fear of missing out on a QB (which is stupid) or the thought that it was okay to trade functional players like Laremy Tunsil and Minkah Fitzpatrick instead of finding ways to make those players work for the betterment of your team...if you see those mistakes you can be honest about why you failed and make better decisions in the future.