dolphintodd
Club Member
- Joined
- Aug 5, 2011
- Messages
- 2,000
- Reaction score
- 1,484
Stats are for losers, the scoreboard is for winners.
Stats are for losers, the scoreboard is for winners.
Not sure where you got your stats but for 2014 we had a 6.3 ypa, in 2016 it was 7.3. That's 26th in 2014 Vs 6th in 2016. That's ypa btwThat makes sense, but it doesn't incorporate the fact that Tannehill's yards per completion under Gase during that period were 10.7, while during the period under Lazor they were 10.6, just a tenth of a yard fewer. Gase was just as dink and dunk as Lazor during these periods.
That makes sense, but it doesn't incorporate the fact that Tannehill's yards per completion under Gase during that period were 10.7, while during the period under Lazor they were 10.6, just a tenth of a yard fewer. Gase was just as dink and dunk as Lazor during these periods.
Not sure where you got your stats but for 2014 we had a 6.3 ypa, in 2016 it was 7.3. That's 26th in 2014 Vs 6th in 2016
https://www.teamrankings.com/nfl/stat/yards-per-pass-attempt?date=2015-02-01
Not sure where you got your stats but for 2014 we had a 6.3 ypa, in 2016 it was 7.3. That's 26th in 2014 Vs 6th in 2016. That's ypa btw
https://www.teamrankings.com/nfl/stat/yards-per-pass-attempt?date=2015-02-01
Fair enough. Fine for evaluating Tannehill maybe but when talking about coaching I think you have to look at the entire year. Our deep game was far better under Gase then under Lazor.I believe he was referring to just the YPA during Ryan's strong multi game stretches not for the whole season if it is indeed correct.
I believe he was referring to just the YPA during Ryan's strong multi game stretches not for the whole season if it is indeed correct.
Fair enough. Fine for evaluating Tannehill maybe but when talking about coaching I think you have to look at the entire year. Our deep game was far better under Gase then under Lazor.
How do you explain the fact that Tannehill's performance during his last 12 games under Lazor in 2014 was indistinct from his higher-quality stretch under Gase last year?
Maybe it's as simple as Tannehill, despite abysmal OL protection, schizophrenic coaching and unqualified mentoring, had a stretch where he was good enough to rise above all that.
you ever try swimming up stream? Hint: it gets exhausting when all the cross-currents are running. Did I mention 7-1 as "distinct" ?So if he can rise above all that, why does all that matter?