Uhh, yeah, he can. Is it astronomical? Absolutely. But he most definitely can. Look up the definition of that word if you dont know it. Or can you not get attacked by a shark if you swim in the ocean?
Either way, i set up that volley ball to able to spike down the fact that he has connections to the murders as much as i have a connection to how my best friend from high school beats his girlfriends (very sad to me but true). I know how ridiculous it is to sue, especially some shmuck on a forum. But the beauty of juris prudence is that you can sue just about anyone for anything.
He clearly types "in connection" to the murders which is false and a defamation to Jackson's character and any reporter doing so better be extremely careful to mention that investigators have cleared him of any wrong doing so it is very clear that "connection" is merely tied to his acquaintances.
But, since you want to be mr. Master debater, swallow it and like it because no matter how trivial the "can" may be, it still exists. The only way it couldnt, would be if the post was never submitted. You have zero debate there. The can exists no matter how slight. Back pedal at your own amusement if you wish.
Nice backpedal job yourself. "Well, ****, I guess I don't have a ****ing clue what I'm talking about regarding libel, so I'm going to change the key word in the sentence to 'can.'" You got one thing right with that thought, you don't have a clue.
And he does have a connection. He posts photos with known gang members, one of which was involved in a murder. Do we need to go over the definition of "connection" too? Hell, you contradict yourself in that very paragraph.
Now go back to posting random nonsensical poems and leave the legal talk to those who don't need to try and sound smart.