| 2012 | 2013 | |
| Attempts | 484 | 588 |
| Completions | 282 | 355 |
| Completion %age | 58.3 | 60.4 |
| TD Rate | 2.5 | 4.1 |
| INT Rate | 2.7 | 2.9 |
| QB Rating | 76.1 | 81.7 |
| YPA | 6.81 | 6.65 |
| Adjusted YPA | 6.1 | 6.21 |
| Net YPA | 5.9 | 5.44 |
| Adjusted Net YPA | 5.23 | 5 |
| WPA | 1.36 | 1.36 |
| EPA | 4.2 | 22.2 |
| WPA/Game | 0.09 | 0.09 |
| EPA/Play | 0.01 | 0.03 |
| Sack %age | 6.7 | 9 |
| Red Zone QB Rating | 86.5 | 101.6 |
| Fumbles | 9 | 9 |
| 4th Quarter Comebacks | 1 | 4 |
| Game-Winning Drives | 1 | 3 |
| ESPN QB Rating | 52.28 | 45.78 |
| PFF QB Rating | 83.34 | 84.93 |
Did Ryan Tannehill Improve Statistically in 2013?
- Thread starter Shouright
- Start date
- Joined
- May 15, 2007
- Messages
- 4,030
- Reaction score
- 760
- Age
- 59
That's what she said.
Yes he did
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2006
- Messages
- 15,845
- Reaction score
- 26,751
Hard to argue that he didn't improve. The biggest sign of improvement are the 4th quarter comebacks and game-winning drives. In 2012, he rarely was able to get the Dolphins in winning positions late in games. This year, I give him credit for pulling out some nice wins late...vs. Atlanta, New England, the game-tying drive vs. Cincy, the late TD drive vs. Pittsburgh.
It doesn't necessarily show up in stats like yardage & TDs & turnovers, but he clearly showed he could lead a team to a win late in the game. That's the sign of a pretty good NFL QB.
He still need to improve, needs to cut down on turnovers, and can't put up terrible performances like he did against Buffalo & the Jets to end the season...when the playoffs are on the line.
It doesn't necessarily show up in stats like yardage & TDs & turnovers, but he clearly showed he could lead a team to a win late in the game. That's the sign of a pretty good NFL QB.
He still need to improve, needs to cut down on turnovers, and can't put up terrible performances like he did against Buffalo & the Jets to end the season...when the playoffs are on the line.
How many threads are we going to have about this? On one hand we had Wallace17Miami make a similar post to try and discredit Tannehill as he does everytime he makes a comment.
Of course he improved. I don't see how it can even be argued.
Of course he improved. I don't see how it can even be argued.
shoveyjoe2442
Practice Squad
- Joined
- Aug 5, 2013
- Messages
- 689
- Reaction score
- 1
Can some explain how the Buffalo lose is Tannehills fault?
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2006
- Messages
- 15,845
- Reaction score
- 26,751
Didn't say the Buffalo loss was Tannehill's fault, but he certainly didn't do anything to help Miami win the game.
mialuv13
Active Roster
- Joined
- Apr 24, 2010
- Messages
- 2,053
- Reaction score
- 9
He definitely improved. I still believe in Tannehill, but I want to see what he can do without playing under Sherman. I believe he needs to graduate from Sherman into the NFL. No more go, go's, no more quasi-roboticness. He showed me some great play this year, and then he showed me some really ****ty unconfident play. I'm willing to give Tannehill 4 years to show his worth, barring an epic collapse next season. Next season he has to show that he truly deserves to be called a franchise QB. More runs, better down field throws, better pocket awareness. He needs to loosen up back there. I like how he reads defenses at the line considering he has only had 2 full seasons in the NFL. His potential has yet been fully tapped and he is still 25.
Canadianfishfan
FinHeavean VIP
The most important stat to me..
WINS. So year there is a slight improvement.
Playoffs... And I'd feel a lot better.
WINS. So year there is a slight improvement.
Playoffs... And I'd feel a lot better.
shoveyjoe2442
Practice Squad
- Joined
- Aug 5, 2013
- Messages
- 689
- Reaction score
- 1
Did anyone else do anything? Sorry 10
Yards rushing, oline allowing pressures every play, Hartline
Drops 20000 passes.
2413fanphins
Active Roster
we had no rush attack. zero rush attack.
we had very inconsistent pass pro... and that beign pretty nice...
he had to put the offense on his back and damn near single handedly do it all. hence the 100 or so extra pass attempts.
yes he improved.
copy and paste this answer for the next 45 threads that are started on this subject
we had very inconsistent pass pro... and that beign pretty nice...
he had to put the offense on his back and damn near single handedly do it all. hence the 100 or so extra pass attempts.
yes he improved.
copy and paste this answer for the next 45 threads that are started on this subject
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2004
- Messages
- 8,249
- Reaction score
- 8,979
Watch the tape. Tannehill wasn't stepping into his throws properly Sunday. Moore should have been playing because Tannehill was favoring the injured leg to the point of ineffectiveness. The Jets game was not indicative of how Tannehill had been playing. But that doesn't match the simpletons' narrative that he sucks.
Give Tannehill any semblance of an offensive line and give him a league average running game and he will continue his ascension into being a quality quarterback who you can win with.
Give Tannehill any semblance of an offensive line and give him a league average running game and he will continue his ascension into being a quality quarterback who you can win with.
Barely improved. One win- that's how much better he was.
At this pace, we will be back in the playoffs in 2 years and might win the division the year after Brady retires. I'm so excited!
Get over Tannehill. Draft a second/third rounder and hope to find talent. If that doesn't work and RT isn't improving, draft a first round QB. Mediocre QBs lead mediocre teams.
At this pace, we will be back in the playoffs in 2 years and might win the division the year after Brady retires. I'm so excited!
Get over Tannehill. Draft a second/third rounder and hope to find talent. If that doesn't work and RT isn't improving, draft a first round QB. Mediocre QBs lead mediocre teams.