No, we should have given up on Henne week 4 of the 2010 season right after that disaster at home vs the Pats where Belechick just had his D sit back as he watched Henne dump passes off to Rob Ninkovich. Right then we should have made the switch back to Pennington who only lasted a play when he was called upon later that year so we likely would have been stuck with Henne anyway. Henne is terrible, he failed like 90% of the time when the game was on the line. I was really hoping Houston scored on there 2nd to last posession so ole Chad would get the ball with 3 minutes or so left needing an FG to tie and TD to win. I think I all know what the result would have been. Matt Moore is a much better QB than Henne and we all know what this site thinks of him. Our offense looked the best it had for years once he settled in after Henne got hurt. Tannehill is, will be much better than both.
I get frustrated in the heat of games at times and have posted negative comments about Tannehill (this weeks was something to the tune of if this game is Dolphins 6 Jets 0 going into the 4th quarter we need to move on at QB) but it wasn't because Tannehill stepped up. That Jets game was the kind of game we would have on like 6 or 9 - 0 with Henne at QB.
All and all when i step back and think about how Tannehill is such an inexperienced QB and is pretty much asked to carry the team (look how out of balance we are) he's doing a great job. It's not good enough yet but he is progressing where Henne was always the same guy and he still is now. Sherman, no matter how much we hate him, asks a lot of Tannehill and I think he has a lot of trust in him whereas Henning, who I know we all hated as well, wold call plays in such a way that Henne wouldn't blow the game. It should be obvious who the better QB is.