Do I remember this correctly...

[EROCK528]

I thought that either Sparano or Ireland remarked that LoBooker was someone that really jumped off the screen when reviewing game film. I accept that he may not be a BP prototypical guy...but I was a little suprised at the trade...unless the remark was a complete smokescreen?

 

[andyahs]

Please stop with the L. Booker threads.

 

[WVDolphan]

Yea. He jumped off their screen as a guy who could hold enough value to get something out of him in efforts to dump as many Cam picks not named Ginn or Satele as possible. The rest of them have no value unfortunately so we couldnt get any picks for them.

 

[67Stang]

Ya, coach said that. This says to me that obviously Bill is pulling the strings, and we have someone else in mind.

 

[Nublar7]

I too was/am surprised of the Booker trade. I didn't see that coming at all.

Was I upset about it though? Not really. I liked Booker and I think he will do well in Philly as a third down back, but I guess he didn't fit into what Sparano/Parcells wants to do. My as well get a fourth for him now then to have to release him later down the road. I think they like bigger backs then the little shifty ones.

 

[Mannyjr23]

Well he's a eagle now...lets move on

 

[NWFLJoe]

It was Sparano. Because of his comments, the move was surprising but not terminal.

 

[U-M_all_day]

too bad couldn't get a 3, but im ok with it now just suprised me to see his name mentioned

 

[doughbraz54]

theres no point in these booker threads. For one its done and over with and for two he wasnt that good to begin with..

 

[Jim C. from NJ]

He jumped so far he jumped right off the roster