mandal24
Genesis
ignore him, dude's being an idiotNo I’ve been very critical of Tua! He is not a franchise QB! But nice try!
ignore him, dude's being an idiotNo I’ve been very critical of Tua! He is not a franchise QB! But nice try!
Listen, are they my favorite choices. Obviously no. There aren't many options but we have reached peak-Tua. We know he will never win a big game. He has shown time and time again, he is incapable with playing against the greats.
Kirk's numbers year over year are ridiculous. He has played with terrible defenses. And Russ was never the problem in Denver. His numbers were solid and he's mobile, can extend plays, oh and he can take a HIT.
It's so ****ing depressing watching actual people fall in love with an opinion to a point where they break down emotionally when they find out it was wrong. I mean... You can change your opinion, and you wont die...
Yes! Exactly. Tua objectively cannot win the big game. Tua objectively cannot extend plays with his feet like all the modern greats do. Phew, i'm getting through to you :) There is hope.It's so ****ing depressing watching actual people fall in love with an opinion to a point where they break down emotionally when they find out it was wrong. I mean... You can change your opinion, and you wont die...
Could it be possible and stay with me here but could it be possible that offense was catered to the OL? Crazy idea but maybe Mikey was trying to mask our OL deficiencies by trying to get rid of the ball quickly to not put so much pressure on the OL to hold their blocks. OR maybe regardless of Tua or the OL Mike just prefers a quick offense. Maybe you should stop assuming you know everything when it's obvious to everyone including your circle-jerk Tua haters that you are one of the least knowledgeable posters here.Fffs, do you people not read. I've said a few times at this point.. The offense is catered to Tua. You proved my point by showing the overwhelming throws that Tua makes is under 2.5 seconds. This is a scheme McDaniel has designed to cater to Tua's inability to stand in the pocket or extend plays. The good teams know this, take away Tua's 1st read and game over. Bills have done it to us time and time again.
you had me up until "circle-jerk Tua haters"Could it be possible and stay with me here but could it be possible that offense was catered to the OL? Crazy idea but maybe Mikey was trying to mask our OL deficiencies by trying to get rid of the ball quickly to not put so much pressure on the OL to hold their blocks. OR maybe regardless of Tua or the OL Mike just prefers a quick offense. Maybe you should stop assuming you know everything when it's obvious to everyone including your circle-jerk Tua haters that you are one of the least knowledgeable posters here.
The Dolphins haven't won big games for decades prior to Tua but it's a Tua problem? I mean isn't that why you people say "same ol Dolphins". If it's the same old Dolphins then how can it be a Tua problem when clearly this has been an issue long before Tua got here? We have consistently **** the bed going back to the Marino years but I guess that can be blamed on Tua as well.Yes! Exactly. Tua objectively cannot win the big game. Tua objectively cannot extend plays with his feet like all the modern greats do. Phew, i'm getting through to you :) There is hope.
You sir get it. Thank you! I'm not out here trying to insult anyone's child but this is factsunder 2.5 seconds, over 2.5 seconds blah blah blah.... The ability for Tua to extend plays and make something out of nothing when the play breaks down is just not his game. I've seen him do it but it certainly is not what he excels at like some QB's. He's just not nimble. Like the dude is running in quicksand. The scheme that has been designed is to get the ball out quickly before the pocket collapses. It is what it is.
This Dolphins team has absolutely nothing to do with prior Dolphins teams. It's a silly argument. The Patriots were a joke in the 90s until they got Bledsoe>Brady, Chiefs were meh until they got Mahomes. The most mediocre team of my lifetime, the Bengals... got Burrow and bam, in the SB in no time.The Dolphins haven't won big games for decades prior to Tua but it's a Tua problem? I mean isn't that why you people say "same ol Dolphins". If it's the same old Dolphins then how can it be a Tua problem when clearly this has been an issue long before Tua got here? We have consistently **** the bed going back to the Marino years but I guess that can be blamed on Tua as well.
Ya because the Bengals who's defense let up almost zero points to opponents in the second half of games the year of thier superbowl run 11 game win streak and the year of the championship appearance had everything to do with Joe Burrow buddy. Ya they were banging out 30 points a game...nope. only 3 teams let up less points that year, Jets, ravens and Bills. My best friend is the biggest bengals Homer in the world you picked the wrong team to hitch your argument to that D took them just as much if not more both years. Stafford got onto a team that had the # defense that year. What happened to their record last year when thier D sucked oh and after Andrew Whitworth retired and they couldn't run the ball for ****. Stafford was traded to a superbowl ready team also and played like **** btw, they won in spite of him and well those mysterious PI calls. (NFL is rigged) So to your point its OK to have a shitty win% as a QB? Tuas about to be a top 3 paid QB if not the top paid. So get ready to swallow it and I hope it leaves a frog in your throat with no drinks near by.See, this is where your stupidity shows (and I really do not like calling people stupid)
Burrow has taken his team to a ****ing Super Bowl for goodness sakes. and then lost in the AFC Conference 'Ship game the year after. This year without him, they're last in the AFC North.
Stafford won a super bowl. Literally the only reason the Lions were even somewhat relevant back in the day.
My goodness, this might be the dumbest post of them all.