Do we actually activate Wilford? | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Do we actually activate Wilford?

schmitty

schmitty

Phins Up!
Joined
Jun 27, 2007
Messages
164
Reaction score
0
Age
41
Location
Louisiana
The Phins know what they have in Ginn, Bess, and out TEs...do we turn to Wilford or say an underdog such as London? Cam is really gonna be missed, he was quitely becoming one of my favorite players to wear a phins uniform as most would say the say...thoughts?
 
I don't think the Dolphins have much of a choice at this point. It would be nice to get SOMETHING out of Wilford before he gets cut in the offseason.
 
I'd rather give London a shot rather than Wilford. London actually has some fire to play.
 
I agree...the kid has some fire when he is on special teams, lets see what he can do with the ball in his hands...and to my understanding he is supposd to be one of the fastest guys on the team
 
I look at it this way, he is gone at the end of the season either way. Why not activate him and let him put on a display for potential buyers. What's the worst that could happen? He plays well and nets us a higher trade bait value or he busts and he gets cut to F/A.
 
Dolpfan_72 said:
I look at it this way, he is gone at the end of the season either way. Why not activate him and let him put on a display for potential buyers. What's the worst that could happen? He plays well and nets us a higher trade bait value or he busts and he gets cut to F/A.
Click to expand...

NO ONE is trading for Wilford.
 
yeah i dont even think we'll get a 7th rounder for him... nobody wants to pay him that contract... wouldn't a team get his remaining 3 years 7 mil, we already paid 6mil of it right? so teams might trade us something since we already paid himhalf, they could get him cheap... he still is a big WR that's had production at Jacksonville, watch NE own with Wilford..

i'd like to activate both, I'd prefer seeing stuff out of the young kid, London he's got swagger, and hopefully he can ball. Wilford, I've already seen what he can do, i'd rather have anthonyarmstrong than wilford at this point, fills the void of a camarillo, strong hands, quick routes... he can catch bombs too...

hopefully we can make good somehow out of that awful wilford signing
 
Yes, we should definitely get Wilford & London into the games. We really need to see what they can do, especially London. This is as good a time as any.
 
I think we have to play wilford. And you never know, he may do good and suprise us.
 
Sparano addressed this in his press conference. He said Wilford has "been getting much better" while London has been somewhat inconsistent...He said London still "plays young."
 
Akronfinfan36 said:
Sparano addressed this in his press conference. He said Wilford has "been getting much better" while London has been somewhat inconsistent...He said London still "plays young."
Click to expand...


Yea Wilford has got so much better he was inactive again this week. I guess he meant he did not suck as bad as previous weeks.
 
Who knows? Wilford may surprise everyone. We are versing the Rams next week.
 
Can someone explain to me why players are listed as inactive? Is there an NFL rule that only allows a team to have a certain number of players on their roster listed as active? Do they save money by keeping him inactive?
 
shula_guy said:
Can someone explain to me why players are listed as inactive? Is there an NFL rule that only allows a team to have a certain number of players on their roster listed as active? Do they save money by keeping him inactive?
Click to expand...

Yes. It is a gay rule. But a rule non-the-less.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom