HollowBeast Active Roster Joined Apr 17, 2018 Messages 393 Reaction score 723 Location Black Hills Apr 16, 2024 #1
Kebo I'm your huckleberry Joined Jan 12, 2014 Messages 3,818 Reaction score 6,389 Location Georgia Apr 16, 2024 #2 It isn’t horrible. I am a big fan of Myles Harden. I think you could have done better at #21.
S Super Duper Clayton Active Roster Joined Feb 26, 2021 Messages 252 Reaction score 331 Age 25 Location Orlando Apr 16, 2024 #3 I’m intrigued by Brassell, but want no part of JPJ in the first
jimthefin Club Member Joined Mar 3, 2004 Messages 6,161 Reaction score 11,672 Apr 16, 2024 #4 I am going to echo the thoughts on taking a C at#21, not to mention one that is probably a better gap than zone blocker. Braswell at #55 is good value at a need position and I like getting Boyd and All on Day 3. Pretty solid, I would probably do the first two picks differently, but not bad at all. Now go ahead and do fifty more.
I am going to echo the thoughts on taking a C at#21, not to mention one that is probably a better gap than zone blocker. Braswell at #55 is good value at a need position and I like getting Boyd and All on Day 3. Pretty solid, I would probably do the first two picks differently, but not bad at all. Now go ahead and do fifty more.
V VAFinsfan72 Club Member Joined Jan 8, 2024 Messages 906 Reaction score 1,764 Age 51 Location Virginia Apr 16, 2024 #5
TurboDurden Active Roster Joined Feb 16, 2022 Messages 141 Reaction score 310 Age 36 Location UK Apr 18, 2024 #6 Bullard at 90 is a great pick, sounds like a very smart player, the kind who has a better career than his measurables would indicate.
Bullard at 90 is a great pick, sounds like a very smart player, the kind who has a better career than his measurables would indicate.