Dolphins frontrunners for Steelers WR Mike Wallace | Page 12 | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Dolphins frontrunners for Steelers WR Mike Wallace

What was the point of this post? Was it to say that our kicker is the only talented player? Because that is beyond the pail in ignorance.
I think it was pretty clear it was a joke. This team is chock full of talent. 6-10 talent. That's what happens when your most talented players are the kickers, a left tackle, and a running back who just earned his first 1k+ season.

This team still has a lot of work to do, but they are finally starting with building in the most important area first: QB.
 
Bush, Miller, Tannehill, Long, Pouncey, Martin, Clay, Wake, Starks, Dansby, Davis, Smith. All of these players have pro bowl talent. Some just need proper coaching to achieve consistency. Once that happens watch out! Also, if you look at the rest of the starters on the team you can't really say there are any scrubs that will hurt the team. Obviously, the team will only go as far as the QB takes them but you can see Tannehill has the talent to be special. And this is coming from a fan who has always been very critical of the team and far from a homer.
The bolded have pro bowl talent currently. The rest either haven't played a down or have been wildly inconsistent.

---------- Post added at 07:59 AM ---------- Previous post was at 07:57 AM ----------

Dude then go be a patriot's fan. We will call you when we think it's time. Then you can pretend you were on board all along.
Thanks for reminding us that fans can't be critical of the team in any way, shape, or form.
 
The bolded have pro bowl talent currently. The rest either haven't played a down or have been wildly inconsistent.
I'd disagree on dansby but the rest yeah. (Dansby was about as consistant and out of shape as the rest of the defense.)

But i'd argue that the most talented team doesn't always win, and a mildly talented team can play outside itself with the right coaching.

---------- Post added at 10:01 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:01 AM ----------


---------- Post added at 07:59 AM ---------- Previous post was at 07:57 AM ----------


Thanks for reminding us that fans can't be critical of the team in any way, shape, or form.
You can be critical in the shape of a square. :p
 
I think it was pretty clear it was a joke. This team is chock full of talent. 6-10 talent. That's what happens when your most talented players are the kickers, a left tackle, and a running back who just earned his first 1k+ season.

This team still has a lot of work to do, but they are finally starting with building in the most important area first: QB.

I agree. With the last statement. Dans by
has pro bowl talent. Odrick too.
 
"The bolded have pro bowl talent currently. The rest either haven't played a down or have been wildly inconsistent."

But that's my point. If they play consistently they will make pro bowls. They have the "talent." I agree Tannehill and Miller haven't played a down. I might be reaching but they impressed the **** out of me when I went to Sunday's practice.
 
Yea can be critical Gonzo. Telling me that this team should lose to get Barkley without given Tannehill a shot is what I can't stand.
 
I'd disagree on dansby but the rest yeah. (Dansby was about as consistant and out of shape as the rest of the defense.)

But i'd argue that the most talented team doesn't always win, and a mildly talented team can play outside itself with the right coaching.

---------- Post added at 10:01 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:01 AM ----------

You can be critical in the shape of a square. :p
I expect far more out of a supposed pro bowl player. He was completely absent the first half of the season.

As for the second point, we were neither.

And the third point, keep it in the PoFo.
 
I agree. With the last statement. Dans by
has pro bowl talent. Odrick too.

Dansby has potential pro bowl talent. When you are completely invisible for half a season, you do not have current pro bowl talent.

Odrick has potential as well, that's it at this point. Still too early to label him with that.
 
"The bolded have pro bowl talent currently. The rest either haven't played a down or have been wildly inconsistent."

But that's my point. If they play consistently they will make pro bowls. They have the "talent." I agree Tannehill and Miller haven't played a down. I might be reaching but they impressed the **** out of me when I went to Sunday's practice.
IF. My favorite word. And to be honest, I couldn't care less about performances in practice, training camp, and preseason. I remember all the pumping up that was going on during the offseason and preseason last year. Didn't mean ****. Show me when it matters.

On a side note, that font color is really hard to read :lol:
 
So any updates on the whole Mike Wallace thing? :thanks:
 
Yea can be critical Gonzo. Telling me that this team should lose to get Barkley without given Tannehill a shot is what I can't stand.

Haven't read all 18 pages, so I don't know who said that. Barkley is no Luck and Philbin is no Sparano (or at least I pray he isn't). Completely different situation this year.
 
I expect far more out of a supposed pro bowl player. He was completely absent the first half of the season.

As for the second point, we were neither.

And the third point, keep it in the PoFo.
Are we talking last year or this year? because while the dansby point is clearly soooo last year, the coaching point was about this year. I don't care what meathead brought to the table, I'm done with thinking about that failed staff. So far all signs are pointing to this coaching staff doing more with less, wereas meathead typically did less with more.

Not sure I get the pofo comment. why so serious?
 
Back
Top Bottom