Almost as funny as a guy talking as if his team that hasn't won a Superbowl since black and white televisions were more common than color ones is actually good.
you do know the last time you guys won a SB was only 5 years after we won ours, right?
Almost as funny as a guy talking as if his team that hasn't won a Superbowl since black and white televisions were more common than color ones is actually good.
oh win %:lol2: I love when phin fans act like they are the Yankees of the NFL b/c of win %:lol2:
The only thing that matters is what junc thinks matters even though nobody thinks highly of junc... What world do you live in? Is the air thinner there? I'll use whatever stats I want while you do the same. The difference is that I have a clue while you... well, I'm not sure you'd know your own name if momma didn't pin it on your vest each morning.
Let me ask you something. Is this your tactic in all aspects of life or or do you only use it on OUR football site? This BS tactic where you cherry pick what dates and stats YOU feel are relevant and laugh off any other perspectives in an attempt to deflect from their obvious destruction of your points of view. Limiting the scope of a debate is a terrible tactic that only serves to weaken your arguments and lessen their validity.
I'm sorry but no matter how much you laugh, you're a fan of a HISTORICALLY terrible football franchise that has seen very very little success in the entirety of their existence. I can see why that would make you jealous of fans of a team such as ours and even make you lash out as you often do here. But really guy, I'm sure there's a support group somewhere for people such as you.
Fortunately for you, logical fallacies aren't against the TOS here; otherwise you'd have been booted long ago. And not a single tear would be shed.
The 70s, 80s and 90s make you very jealous...
you are using win % which is useless and you are talking about cherry picking? seriously?
My team has been historically mediocre, your team has been historically better but you've been bad for a LONG time now. I am glad you have precious memories of the 70s and 80s though.
That's your opinion just like it's mine (and every other rational thinkers) that losing 2 AFCC games is useless. That doesn't stop you from bringing it up every freaking day though, does it?
And, Mediocre? Really? They have a losing record. That's not mediocre, that's awful. Nice spin though.
you do know the last time you guys won a SB was only 5 years after we won ours, right?
I bring it up when it is relevant to a discussion, do I bring up the 80s? do I bring up SB III? those days aren't relevant. the title game apps are especially when the discussion turns to our former QB who helped us reach those games. It sucks to have lost but you surely would agree it's better than sitting at home every postseason, right?
You do know that the last time you won the division was 6 years before our last time. That's over a decade ago. Not something successful teams do.
See, I can pull random nonsense out of my butt too!
I don't hijack anything, go through the records. it's usually other posters who only want the homer point of view hijacking it by attacking me or bringing up something Jet related. I go w/ the flow. wherever you guys want the discussion to go I'll go with it. I don't run and hide like certain posters(cough*cough*presnapreads*cough). You want to bash me? go ahead, you want to deflect? go ahead? do what makes you happy.You bring it up every day in almost every thread that you decide to hijack with your nonsense.
Those days would be relevant to you if your team weren't so terrible during that time.
that's awesome but the greatest team in the history of the division has dominated since then and we are the ONLY team to win the AFC East besides NE in a year Tom Brady was the primary starter for NE. we still made a bunch of playoff apps and we even knocked off our biggest rivals on the road in postseason a year they went 14-2 and looked unstoppable.
I don't hijack anything, go through the records. it's usually other posters who only want the homer point of view hijacking it by attacking me or bringing up something Jet related. I go w/ the flow. wherever you guys want the discussion to go I'll go with it. I don't run and hide like certain posters(cough*cough*presnapreads*cough). You want to bash me? go ahead, you want to deflect? go ahead? do what makes you happy.
Do not accuse me of deflecting while you do it yourself. This nonsense about "the greatest team in the history yada yada yada" is the very definition of deflection.
sorry if it offends but no team has dominated the division like NE has. 11 div titles in 13 years, would be 12 in 13 if Brady didn't get hurt in 2008, 5 SB apps, 3 SB wins. a true dynasty, only Pitt, SF and Dallas have had true dynasties.
Miami was great in the 70s but they weren't the '01-'current Pats.
how was that deflecting anyway? you bashed us for not winning more div titles. we had the Pats to deal with making it almost impossible.
There was much better diversity back then, as far as our division goes. We saw mini-dynasties of the Colts and Fins in the 70's, the Fins and Bills in the 80's and a pretty even split of the 5 teams (minus the lone division title the jests took in 1998) during the 90's. Yes, the Pats have dominated the division since 2001 but in my opinion, that's Belicheck benefiting from his own god given ability to polish turds into diamonds, and a glaring weakness by the remaining 3 teams in the division.
It'd be like Bills fans whining about how they'd have won a bunch od SB's if only the Cowboys weren't so darn good.