electrolyte
☠️ Banned ☠️
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2009
- Messages
- 2,379
- Reaction score
- 38
I think the whole traditional power structure is a flawed mess to begin with and should be abolished. -ALL- Head Coaches should have full control over their rosters. They are the ones who have a game plan and a strategy. They are the ones who know how to use certain players, and they know when they can't use a certain player. For example, some coaches don't know how to use Reggie Bush, but another Coach may know how to. Or simply doesn't want to, because he is trying to build a team in a different way, and has no use when his GM goes and pays Reggie Bush 5mil per year to be his RB.
All General Managers should only be there as a sort of assistant to the Head Coach. They do their jobs and get the Coach what he wants, period.
If Coach says he wants Brandon Albert, because he doesn't want to use Johnathan Martin, then go get him Brandon Albert. A coach will succeed much better when he has the ability to go into his toolbox and get the exact tools he needs for his game plans. A coach who needs to use tools that someone else gets him, and he may not even know how to use correctly, or even want to use, is a terrible idea.
That would be like me trying to install a wall mount for an large HDTV, and the GM comes to give me some toggleables and tells me to just use these and mount it to the drywall. I don't like this method, and I want to use lag screws in the studs, on a different spot on the wall. My method is more secure and can hold more weight, the GM's is risky and forcing me to do a method I don't like doing. Just asking for trouble with the weight of the TV (If it's heavy), and he is compromising my skill by making me use methods I don't approve of. I will underachieve, by being saddled with someone who should have no business in telling me what tools to use. It's the same thing with players on a football team.
Bill Parcells (yes I know we hate him) used to complain about this all of the time. Remember his famous "If I am going to cook the soup, I want to choose the ingredients" line?
It makes complete sense. The Head Coach should be above the GM. The Coach can choose exactly the players he wants, to play the style he wants. And this in turn will help him be more successful.
All General Managers should only be there as a sort of assistant to the Head Coach. They do their jobs and get the Coach what he wants, period.
If Coach says he wants Brandon Albert, because he doesn't want to use Johnathan Martin, then go get him Brandon Albert. A coach will succeed much better when he has the ability to go into his toolbox and get the exact tools he needs for his game plans. A coach who needs to use tools that someone else gets him, and he may not even know how to use correctly, or even want to use, is a terrible idea.
That would be like me trying to install a wall mount for an large HDTV, and the GM comes to give me some toggleables and tells me to just use these and mount it to the drywall. I don't like this method, and I want to use lag screws in the studs, on a different spot on the wall. My method is more secure and can hold more weight, the GM's is risky and forcing me to do a method I don't like doing. Just asking for trouble with the weight of the TV (If it's heavy), and he is compromising my skill by making me use methods I don't approve of. I will underachieve, by being saddled with someone who should have no business in telling me what tools to use. It's the same thing with players on a football team.
Bill Parcells (yes I know we hate him) used to complain about this all of the time. Remember his famous "If I am going to cook the soup, I want to choose the ingredients" line?
It makes complete sense. The Head Coach should be above the GM. The Coach can choose exactly the players he wants, to play the style he wants. And this in turn will help him be more successful.