Are you aware that you can't be involved in "ridiculous game losing INT's" if you are not already winning the game?
A "slight" overstatement on your part, I guess.
So now you have made the same kind of mistake as having made "ridiculous game losing INT's", just in writing. - LOL
Read a study a few years ago that stated the obvious. QBs winning in 4Q have a higher completion rate, higher rating, and lower INTs than losing QBs. Obvious, since losing QBs have to take more risk.
Can;t emphasis this enough. JA is the better QB, however, changing noting but swapping JA for TT, JA would look worse, TT better. Supporting cast matters.