NJPHIN34
Seasoned Veteran
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/draft05/columns/story?columnist=pasquarelli_len&id=2031067
Maybe we should play it safe and take one of the three in the 1st round. Since according to some, the depth at RB is not as good as some say it is.
Indeed, once you move past the three sure-fire first-round selections, there lately has developed a suspicion that the alleged depth of the tailback pool in the 2005 draft does not live up to its hype.
"Because of what's happened the past 10 years or so, with teams being able to locate productive [tailbacks] later in the draft, we've been kind of lulled into this feeling that it will always be that way," said one AFC college scouting director. "And looking a little bit harder at this year's draft now, I've got to tell you, it might be kind of a false sense of security. You hear a lot of guys in my profession, people I respect, talking about all of the depth at running back. Maybe it's just me but, man, I don't see it."
Maybe we should play it safe and take one of the three in the 1st round. Since according to some, the depth at RB is not as good as some say it is.