No, Drew Tate is 6' 0". Chris Leak is 5' 11". As far as passing ability and gustiness, I'd rather have Drew Tate. Leak is a better runner. I would not Miami to draft or get Leak via FA. Tate would be a good FA pick up.
No, no he's not.
Chris Leak not only has better completion percentages, a better td/int ratio and a higher quarterback rating, but also a bigger frame, and is barely taller than Drew Tate. Websites have Troy Smith listed at 6'1, but I bet you believe that too, dont you.
Chris Leak and Drew Tate are both listed as 6'0, but Leak is bigger. Trust me on this. I'll be sure to save this post and make you eat your words when the combine numbers come out if you want to keep disagreeing with me based on your " information ".
What, again, makes you think Drew Tate is a better passer than Chris Leak?
CMP ATT YDS CMP% YPA LNG TD INT
207 352 2623 58.8 7.45 64 18 13
232 365 2942 63.6 8.06 66 23 13
Which QB would you rather have throwing you the ball? Leak did all this in a harder conference against harder opponents.
I mean, Leak is AT LEAST the same height ( by same height I meant within .25 inches of each other ) while 15 lbs heavier, he's quicker, has a better arm, better accuracy, and apparently makes better decisions, while learning a much harder playbook and learning it well.
Common sense would only dictate that Leak is the much better choice to pick up in the late rounds. But I guess if you're a diehard Chris Leak hater and want to be different by saying " drew tate " it'd be a good choice.
You claim to be a "diehard Iowa" fan but then you go on saying he's had a disappointing two years. What kind of Diehard Iowa fan doesn't know that Drew Tate had his best season last year?