I think Zach is, as we all know, a top tier talent in the right scheme.....with top tier risk for the buyer. He is a risk for obvious reasons. I don't really see him fitting in as a every down LB in New England, but who knows with those guys. He is an average blitzer, if not below average. Zach would fit great in their coverage schemes though.
Anyway, I really like Karlos Dansby and his Parcells type size. He is a gamer and makes plays. Suggs is better than Briggs IMO, (I am probably alone on this) for many reasons. Anyway, maybe Parcells will go younger in The LB position, than expensive guys nearing maximum value. If I was Jeff Ireland, I would use the draft early 3rd( on a LB ) and free agency for another LB to get ..At the least Dansby. Too bad Porter costs so much. He should re-structure as he is tying up funds at a position that could come cheaper this year to obtain. I will look to evaluate the free agents and the draft at the front seven position for some notes if anyone is interested. This was just " top of my mind" discussion and I'll follow up later.
Anyway, I really like Karlos Dansby and his Parcells type size. He is a gamer and makes plays. Suggs is better than Briggs IMO, (I am probably alone on this) for many reasons. Anyway, maybe Parcells will go younger in The LB position, than expensive guys nearing maximum value. If I was Jeff Ireland, I would use the draft early 3rd( on a LB ) and free agency for another LB to get ..At the least Dansby. Too bad Porter costs so much. He should re-structure as he is tying up funds at a position that could come cheaper this year to obtain. I will look to evaluate the free agents and the draft at the front seven position for some notes if anyone is interested. This was just " top of my mind" discussion and I'll follow up later.