You say this draft is jam packed with pass rushers but we should take one at #25 even with other big needs? If there's that many why not fill a spot that's not so plentiful in the draft and get a pass rusher in round 2 or even 3.
There are indeed a lot of good pass rushers in this draft. Players like Clint Sintim and Michael Johnson who probably would be a first round pick in other years are likely to go in the second round. I won't deny that that begs the question of why we would go there at 25 when it is not our only need.
There are 4 answers to your question. First, I think that there is a good chance that a very good pass-rusher who
should not fall to 25 will do so. The central question in this thread is why Everette Brown is falling, and my opinion is that he hasn't done anything to merit the drop in his stock. As stated already, I would not be shocked if the Packers take him at 9.
But the Jason Peters trade increases the chance that a player like Brown will fall to us because it takes a team that probably was going to pick a pass-rusher at 11 and gives it a giant need at LT. I think the Bills will have to take Michael Oher at 11, and if they do that they are not drafting Robert Ayers or Brown or Aaron Maybin. Even though most of those types of players still won't make it to 25, if any one of them does I would advocate taking him because there is a consensus that they are first-round worthy players among NFL teams and we are filling a need.
The second reason to take a pass-rusher at 25 is that, depending on who is on the board, a WR or CB is probably not good value at that point in the draft. Of the three players you mentioned, Darius Butler is the most likely to go in the first round. Nicks is getting slammed for gaining weight between the Combine and his Pro Day - even with an injury, NFL teams are saying, he shouldn't have gained 14 pounds so quickly.
A lot of teams think that Smith is a better safety prospect than CB prospect in the NFL and so do not want to take him in the first round. They look at his size and conclude that he can't play CB because very few CBs are so big in the NFL. It's a stupid rationale in my opinion because you need to evaluate the prospect, not rely on stereotypes, but maybe we can take advantage of it.
If we can still draft Nicks and/or Smith in the second round, why jump the gun and pick either one at 25? I have seen more than one draft in which we get
both in the second round. Check out
www.draftcountdown.com - that's a site that's been around for a long time and is as good as any out there. Scott Wright, who runs the site, has us picking Brown at 25, Nicks at 44, and Smith at 56, if I remember correctly.
Third, ask anyone who frequents this board how much Bill Parcells likes LBs. When we draft a pass-rusher, we are probably going to draft someone who is a hybrid DE/LB in our 3-4 scheme. Parcells started out in the NFL as a linebacker coach, and it seems like he thinks he evaluates that position best. Look at his history of drafting players in the first round.
Finally, we should draft the BPA and that player is probably going to be a pass-rusher, even if no pass-rusher falls dramatically. The fact that there are a lot of good pass-rushers in this draft and that we can get one after round one does not change the fact that there is a difference between the quality of player we can draft in round one as opposed to later.