Fins Offense | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Fins Offense

WPBtoRNOFinFan

WPBtoRNOFinFan

Practice Squad
Joined
Mar 13, 2006
Messages
673
Reaction score
0
Location
Reno, Nevada
Alright lets be honest here, our offense has quite a few question marks to it before we start to annoint ourselves as playing at home for the super bowl.....but our offense should honestly be one of the top in the NFL next year.

DC to CC
R&R(pending Ricky's return)


However, our OL is unproven, we have a question mark at fullback, the O-line is one big question mark, although well coached, the talent has GOT to be there. C and LT/RT are the biggest questionmarks, will V.Carey get moved inside to RG where he played in college at the U, will we sign Ashworth, will Rex be at C next year, etc. Also, our offense needs a consistent #2 reciever, althought Booker is good, I feel that if our offense is going to be as high-powered as everybody seems to think, then we need to have a more solid #2 WR. TE and RB are the only true areas without question, we have 5 TE's on roster (the number of which will obviously diminish over time), and then of course Ronnie is amazing. Also, Culpepper's knee needs to be healthy, and I am wondering if he will be able to do the same kind of scrambling he has done in the past once he is better.

Just throwing a few things out there.
 
bwallen said:
:tongue: kay-jay harris fore fullback
Click to expand...

:sidelol: /also the o-line is a big ?. especially LT (not sold on L.J. Shelton)
 
finsfan_84 said:
yes and if we add chad jackson we could be one of the tops in the NFL
Click to expand...

why are so many fascinated with taking a wide receiver with the first pick. We have so many more needs to deal with other than wide receiver. We dont need a number one reciever. We need depth at the 3 and 4th spot at the position. Marty Booker is a good number 2 receiver. He made the pro bowl a years ago when he was with the Bears. People make it sound like Booker is garbage. He is not. If he had a good quarterback throwing him the ball we would have seen more of him.
 
everyone said the same thing about last years o line before the season started, and look what happened. theyve played better than they have in a long time with a bunch of schlepers out there. i think that with 3 of the 5 guys coming back, they have the potential to be even better this year. im not nearly as concerned with the o line as i was last season. hudson proved his magical abilities and no one should be questionaing them now.
 
finsgonewild said:
why are so many fascinated with taking a wide receiver with the first pick. We have so many more needs to deal with other than wide receiver. We dont need a number one reciever. We need depth at the 3 and 4th spot at the position. Marty Booker is a good number 2 receiver. He made the pro bowl a years ago when he was with the Bears. People make it sound like Booker is garbage. He is not. If he had a good quarterback throwing him the ball we would have seen more of him.
Click to expand...
i completely agree with you. while i was not entirely excited about giving up ogunleye( malcontents will not be tolerated) to get him i was very happy with getting booker on our squad. and aside from a few dropped passes he has held up his end of the bargain. we are more than okay at wide receiver.
 
who said anything about booker being trash?


Have you seen Chad Jackson? Hes like 6'3 lil over 200lbs and RAN A 3.32 40, this kid will be amazing, im thinking a faster version and less tempered TO :0 :O :O

thats right i said it, he is the next TO
 
finsfan_84 said:
who said anything about booker being trash?


Have you seen Chad Jackson? Hes like 6'3 lil over 200lbs and RAN A 3.32 40, this kid will be amazing, im thinking a faster version and less tempered TO :0 :O :O

thats right i said it, he is the next TO
Click to expand...

wow running a 3.32. haha
 
you guys are a trip...fullback? you're worried about fullback? lol. that really isn't even a position in our offense. if anything it's an H-back roll in 2 TE sets and we signed 2 TEs and brought alex holmes back. for short yardage downs (goalline, 3rd and 1 etc..) we have barnes who is good enough.

right about now this offense is looking pretty good. the o line is not going to be great, but it wasnt terrible last year and should improve for the 2nd straight year. things are looking good. it's the other side of the ball where all the question marks are.
 
finsfan_84 said:
who said anything about booker being trash?


Have you seen Chad Jackson? Hes like 6'3 lil over 200lbs and RAN A 3.32 40, this kid will be amazing, im thinking a faster version and less tempered TO :0 :O :O

thats right i said it, he is the next TO
Click to expand...

The guy never was dominant at the college level.
 
u do know that there are alot of people who dont dominate at the college level who become great pros right?

He has great hands and a great body, hes fast, he can become a star in this league, you watch
 
finsfan_84 said:
u do know that there are alot of people who dont dominate at the college level who become great pros right?

He has great hands and a great body, hes fast, he can become a star in this league, you watch
Click to expand...

that is true about any player in the draft. Just because he is athletic does not mean he will be good. Combine stats mean nothing once your in the pros. Jackson maybe the fastest wide receiver in the draft, but will that translate into game speed? You can only go so far with athletic ability. There are some players who have none at all and are very good players. You should not want a good just because he had good combine stats because it does not always translate into success.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom