First Team Offense ! !

[dolfreak]

I believe the Dolphins need to seriously consider playing David Boston instead of Marty Booker with the First Team Offense. Boston has been way more consistent than Booker this preseason and he also brings alot more speed and power. Although I love having Marty on the squad, I don't see him as anything more than an average Possesion receiver. Having Chambers and Boston lined up together is way more explosive, especially when you add Ricky and Ronnie to the picture.
My first team offense looks like this:


Chambers
Boston
McMichael
Ricky/Ronnie
Evans
Welker


Having Booker,Gilmore, and Lorenzo Diamond come into the game from the bench is a great commodity not many teams in the NFL have.

 

[CitizenSnips]

Booker's the most solid receiver we have. However, because most of us know before hand he won't break a catch for 40 some yards means no one wants to start him. well booker can flat out play. Bostons been doing well, i won't argue that at all, however, i'd like to see who will perform better against denver first. and no matter what, i think boston still has awhile before taking the spot from booker.

 

[paskerbrandon]

I dont know just yet to make that switch. Lets see Booker play a little in the regular season and if he is still quiet, move him up to the #2 spot.

 

[dolfreak]

I dont know just yet to make that switch. Lets see Booker play a little in the regular season and if he is still quiet, move him up to the #2 spot.

From what I saw of him last year he wasn't impressive at all. Do you guys forget that Boston has "T.O. Like" potential...

 

[CitizenSnips]

From what I saw of him last year he wasn't impressive at all. Do you guys forget that Boston has "T.O. Like" potential...

he also has 't.o. like' problems it seems.

 

[dolfreak]

he also has 't.o. like' problems it seems.

Off the field issues do not dictate where you stand on the depth chart....if that were the case Ricky would be last on the depth chart. Boston is more explosive than Booker...it's not even close.

 

[FakeSpike13]

Chambers has dropping issues.. he clearly dropped at least 3-4 passes last game~

 

[CitizenSnips]

Off the field issues do not dictate where you stand on the depth chart....if that were the case Ricky would be last on the depth chart. Boston is more explosive than Booker...it's not even close.

didn't say it was close. bookers not explosive, this is true. However bookers the kind of guy who will catch 5 balls on a drive to put miami in the redzone, but boston will catch the TD and get all the credit.

 

[paskerbrandon]

he also has 't.o. like' problems it seems.

Nah hes been acting mature latley, very much unlike T.O. I mean this guy is playing for the vet minium, I think he DID have TO like problems, but not now.

 

[dolfreak]

Booker's the most solid receiver we have. However, because most of us know before hand he won't break a catch for 40 some yards means no one wants to start him. well booker can flat out play. Bostons been doing well, i won't argue that at all, however, i'd like to see who will perform better against denver first. and no matter what, i think boston still has awhile before taking the spot from booker.

Booker drops more balls than anyone of our WR's....Chambers is the best we got.

 

['Deep]

I`m a big Boston fan, but I`m not sure if he`s ready to start ahead of Booker. Once the season gets underway, he could supplant Booker at some point, I just don`t see it happening right now. I like Bostons attitude and work ethic so far, he`s playing like a man on a mission. All three guys are going to see plenty of time in this offense.

 

[Ohio Fanatic]

Booker's the most solid receiver we have. However, because most of us know before hand he won't break a catch for 40 some yards means no one wants to start him. well booker can flat out play. Bostons been doing well, i won't argue that at all, however, i'd like to see who will perform better against denver first. and no matter what, i think boston still has awhile before taking the spot from booker.

I agree somewhat, but when you're offensive line and QB are struggling I'd like to see the better "playmaker' out there. It's Boston. Booker is more reliable, but he's slower and he doesn't catch everything like OJ McDuffie did for us. I'd prefer to play Boston on 1st and 2nd down and bring in Booker for 3rd down, plus I don't think Boston can play every down w/o getting hurt.

 

[dolfreak]

I agree somewhat, but when you're offensive line and QB are struggling I'd like to see the better "playmaker' out there. It's Boston. Booker is more reliable, but he's slower and he doesn't catch everything like OJ McDuffie did for us. I'd prefer to play Boston on 1st and 2nd down and bring in Booker for 3rd down, plus I don't think Boston can play every down w/o getting hurt.

AGREE!

 

[alopez34]

I believe the Dolphins need to seriously consider playing David Boston instead of Marty Booker with the First Team Offense. Boston has been way more consistent than Booker this preseason and he also brings alot more speed and power. Although I love having Marty on the squad, I don't see him as anything more than an average Possesion receiver. Having Chambers and Boston lined up together is way more explosive, especially when you add Ricky and Ronnie to the picture.
My first team offense looks like this:


Chambers
Boston
McMichael
Ricky/Ronnie
Evans
Welker


Having Booker,Gilmore, and Lorenzo Diamond come into the game from the bench is a great commodity not many teams in the NFL have.

is welker ur qb?

 

[CitizenSnips]

I agree somewhat, but when you're offensive line and QB are struggling I'd like to see the better "playmaker' out there. It's Boston. Booker is more reliable, but he's slower and he doesn't catch everything like OJ McDuffie did for us. I'd prefer to play Boston on 1st and 2nd down and bring in Booker for 3rd down, plus I don't think Boston can play every down w/o getting hurt.

as long as Bookers penciled in as the starter , I don't care how they deal with the situation after that point. so I agree.