its fine u dont want moore, whatever i cant really argue with you anymore about that because i know where you stand on it, but you really think then matt ****ing flynn is the guy?
i mean come on, u dont want moore, ok, but you think matt flynn is that much more proven and better, than rather than go with moore for another year on the cheap, its worth it to give a guy, and no i dont care about 1 meaningless game that he had despite the stats, its still 1 game in the grand scheme of things, you think that is a guy worth being handed the starting job and being paid close to top qb money? just curious.
as many defencies as moore may have as you like to point out, hes also not as god awful as you make him out to be. hes deff not worthy of a monster contract yet, but hes def not that bad as to where a guy like matt ****ing flynn should just be able to walk in here like hes peyton manning and be handed a job without winning it. if flynn is so great like everyone on here thinks, he should have no problem winning the qb competition with that great talent he has.
maybe its just me, but i personally dont see matt flynn specifically as a major upgrade, or heck maybe not even an upgrade at all to moore, and if it only came down to those 2 qbs for starting job, i rather go with the guy who we are paying **** to, who despite some problems also showed some nice stuff, see what he can do, and if he ****ing blows, we cut his *** and move on and go all in for barkley next year ( and no not lose intentionally for him but trade everything we can, because that is the next franchise qb to come out, and im assuming that one of the teams next season that has the 1st overall pick has a good chance of having drafted their future qb already and it maybe a very tradeable pick) as opposed to just giving someone totally unproven for the most part 60 million a year, and yes you can say any college qb also has not proven anything in the nfl, which is true, but college qbs when they are drafted are drafted based on their college resume, and at least these draft picks were able to pick apart that level of talent, be it inferior or not, as opposed to flynn who couldnt even do well at the college level ( and dont say he won a national title, alabama never has a qb and they have won 3 under saban i believe, its all the defense in those colleges)