Rubbin420
Marino for President
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2006
- Messages
- 574
- Reaction score
- 0
For all the judgements made on Ginn vs. Quinn it surprises me what some people still have on the brain.
Im tired of hearing, "Why did we draft a K/R specialist in the first round?"
The odds of a WR playing up to par in the first year is VERY rare. You cant expect a young guy to come in and be as capable as Chambers, Booker, (even Hagan)
The guy is going to participate in the team day 1 instead of paying first round money for a guy to sit on the bench. I repeat that twice for those who wanted Quinn, cuz thats what 15 million in guarenteed money would have got us this year. A bench warmer. Plus the guy is an ahole to boot.
So I propose this idea: GIVE THE GUY A CHANCE BEFORE YOU CALL HIM A BAD PICK!
We have a KR/PR this year, and a starting WR next year. Thats a well thought out plan by the front office.
He is going to contribute on day 1, and I can bet that our special teams plays are going to be a lot more exciting to watch. Even for the haters.
Im tired of hearing, "Why did we draft a K/R specialist in the first round?"
The odds of a WR playing up to par in the first year is VERY rare. You cant expect a young guy to come in and be as capable as Chambers, Booker, (even Hagan)
The guy is going to participate in the team day 1 instead of paying first round money for a guy to sit on the bench. I repeat that twice for those who wanted Quinn, cuz thats what 15 million in guarenteed money would have got us this year. A bench warmer. Plus the guy is an ahole to boot.
So I propose this idea: GIVE THE GUY A CHANCE BEFORE YOU CALL HIM A BAD PICK!
We have a KR/PR this year, and a starting WR next year. Thats a well thought out plan by the front office.
He is going to contribute on day 1, and I can bet that our special teams plays are going to be a lot more exciting to watch. Even for the haters.
