I can see alot of people bitching this morning and TBH Im kind of baffled... I think some people's expectations really dont add up to what they post... While the consensus for the season was around 9 wins, with the worst part of the schedule behind us on a 3 game winning streak all against AFC opponents, what exactly are we bitching about, if not that your actual expectations(not the ones you posted) must have been 10+ wins?
Nothing about that win was perfect, but we are far from having the talent to play perfect football, nevermind contending for a SB... The offense didnt look GREAT, but you have to account for the fact the Jets have best best front 4 in football, AND that our only deep threat left the game. Add just those 2 up and it plays right into the Jets defense's hands, no matter where they ranked prior to the game. It allowed them to completely ignore the deep field and stack to the short stuff. The offense still converted 45% of their 3rd downs, and still managed to score 2 TDs.
The defense wasnt perfect either, getting crushed on the run, but they held the Jets to 3-11 3rd down conversions, thats very good. Some are saying Fitz played a bad game and gave it up to the Fins, Fine! But dont turn around and **** on Tannehill because his stats werent through the roof, he converted 3rd downs and DID NOT give the game to the Jets, he allowed the TEAM to win the game... Call it game manager, average, whatever... Because available options are usually below that benchmark. I think alot of people underestimate how hard it is to find a QB that can win regardless of the talent around them, and overestimate the options available to teams looking for even a stop gap QB...
What Im really saying here is after 15+ years plus of HORRIBLE coaching and HORRIBLE QBs and HORRIBLE OLs... I dont see how anyone is in any position to bitch about a 3 game winning streak against Pitts, Buffalo and the ****ing Jets... Im happy as **** this morning and reading the board if depressing as ****...
Nothing about that win was perfect, but we are far from having the talent to play perfect football, nevermind contending for a SB... The offense didnt look GREAT, but you have to account for the fact the Jets have best best front 4 in football, AND that our only deep threat left the game. Add just those 2 up and it plays right into the Jets defense's hands, no matter where they ranked prior to the game. It allowed them to completely ignore the deep field and stack to the short stuff. The offense still converted 45% of their 3rd downs, and still managed to score 2 TDs.
The defense wasnt perfect either, getting crushed on the run, but they held the Jets to 3-11 3rd down conversions, thats very good. Some are saying Fitz played a bad game and gave it up to the Fins, Fine! But dont turn around and **** on Tannehill because his stats werent through the roof, he converted 3rd downs and DID NOT give the game to the Jets, he allowed the TEAM to win the game... Call it game manager, average, whatever... Because available options are usually below that benchmark. I think alot of people underestimate how hard it is to find a QB that can win regardless of the talent around them, and overestimate the options available to teams looking for even a stop gap QB...
What Im really saying here is after 15+ years plus of HORRIBLE coaching and HORRIBLE QBs and HORRIBLE OLs... I dont see how anyone is in any position to bitch about a 3 game winning streak against Pitts, Buffalo and the ****ing Jets... Im happy as **** this morning and reading the board if depressing as ****...