He only takes 2 classes at Ohio St and 1 of those classes is........."The History of Rock and Roll"
I know all of these major athletes do this kind of stuff, but my god. The History of Rock and Roll.
So what?
He is gonna be a lottery pick...he will not need a degree.
He is still elidgible.
What is the point?
I know it's a typo but it's funny talking about a kid doing nothing in college and you wrote "elidgible"
It is Eligible. The "D" is right next to the "G" on the keyboard. I type fast..that is why you often see me type the word "The" like this: "Teh"
no point.
the dude doesn't give a **** about college. it just gives him something to do until he becomes eligible for the draft.
btw, no way the kid is18...he looks like he is 55.
So what?
He is gonna be a lottery pick...he will not need a degree.
He is still elidgible.
What is the point?
THE POINT is that this is still NCAA basketball. And he is supposed to be a "STUDENT ATHLETE". And when you take 2 classes and one is the history of rock and roll.........you really aren't a student. Yes, by the "letter of the law" he is eligable to play. BUT, the NCAA should tweak this rule to not let these kids just come in and do nothing taking joke courses and only 2 courses at that and then just play basketball. Make a rule they must be enrolled in at least 4 classes or something. That isn't unreasonable!!!! It isn't fair to the REAL student athletes out there who must juggle classes, practice, games....etc!!
And because he is turning pro after this year, he can stop going to classes NOW!!!!!! Because by the time the tournament ends whether he is eligable for next semester means nothing he is gone. So, this kid went to Ohio St ......took 2 classes in 1 full year (History of Rock and Roll as one of them) and will then turn pro. How is he a student athlete???? and if you don't see that as a FLAW in the system.........then I dont' know what to tell ya
THE POINT is that this is still NCAA basketball. And he is supposed to be a "STUDENT ATHLETE". And when you take 2 classes and one is the history of rock and roll.........you really aren't a student. Yes, by the "letter of the law" he is eligable to play. BUT, the NCAA should tweak this rule to not let these kids just come in and do nothing taking joke courses and only 2 courses at that and then just play basketball. Make a rule they must be enrolled in at least 4 classes or something. That isn't unreasonable!!!! It isn't fair to the REAL student athletes out there who must juggle classes, practice, games....etc!!
And because he is turning pro after this year, he can stop going to classes NOW!!!!!! Because by the time the tournament ends whether he is eligable for next semester means nothing he is gone. So, this kid went to Ohio St ......took 2 classes in 1 full year (History of Rock and Roll as one of them) and will then turn pro. How is he a student athlete???? and if you don't see that as a FLAW in the system.........then I dont' know what to tell ya
I don't worry about the players but I worry about the kids. What type of message does this send? You don't have to be smart if your athletic?
What happens when a kid doesn't get a good education because he doesn't think he needs to and then he blows out his knee and has no career in sports? What happens to all the kids who decide they don't need to study but then fall short? What road is our society taking?
I totally agree with you but Ohio State could careless if Greg Oden decides he wants and education. Ohio State is making money hand over foot and the extra exposure is priceless. I like seeing these guys in college but they don't really want to be there. I am debating if its worse to let these guys linger on NBA teams and be 19 year old millionaires with ego's, or play 1 year of college ball on a worthless schedule of classes while becoming a espn highlight.