Hennings Thoughts on Offense | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Hennings Thoughts on Offense

Frank B

Starter
Joined
Aug 2, 2005
Messages
281
Reaction score
0
I thoroughly enjoyed hearing Dan Hennings thoughts on the offense right now. Check the story out here. http://blogs.sun-sentinel.com/sports_football_dolphins/2008/09/dan-henning-unf.html

Two insights I found interesting. When asked what he had seen from Ernest Wilford in practice this week, Henning answered,
“[Friday] will be more of an indicator for me because I have him slated to do some specific things in practice. That will be the litmus test for me. Some of the things that we did in that last game with him, the way he caught those balls, we want to try to get him in those spots.” I don't know if Henning was confused, but HE HAD to have known that Wilford was inactive.

The second thing I found of interest was his response about Chad Pennington's lack of arm strength affecting the playcalling. Here's what Henning had to say:
“If I felt like that was necessary to take that into account we wouldn’t have him out there. He has to be able to run whatever we are doing. I don’t see that as a shortcoming. I remember when he came into the league, and at this point in time, we’re talking about a very smart guy. We’re talking about a guy who has great anticipation there, knowledge of coverages, tremendous knowledge of coverages. I can remember Bob Griese here at the same age, when I was coaching Bob here at the same age, and I can remember Dan Fouts in the league at the same age, they had no stronger arm than Chad Pennington has. If things are smooth and operable around him, this guy is going to be a very effective quarterback.”

I bring up Pennington because if you watch the Chad Pennington that used to tear up our defense and the guy that played for us on Sunday, you see two different quarterbacks. I think with a few more games and practices under his belt, getting more familiar with our receivers, Pennington should show us the QB skills that made him effective with the Jets. I think the key is anticipation. Pennington always compensated for his lack of a cannon arm by anticipating the throw better than almost any QB in the league. He would throw to a spot and the ball would always come out on time. That's his strength. When the receivers get better at timing and become more reliable in getting to those spots, Pennington will shine.
 
Did anyone hear him say about the strengths and weaknesses of the WRs that "There aren't any b-tches"?
 
Some of the things that we did in that last game with him, the way he caught those balls, we want to try to get him in those spots.” I don't know if Henning was confused, but HE HAD to have known that Wilford was inactive.

I think he's referring to the preseason game with New Orleans, meaning, the last game we played with Wilford in it.

I like this accountability thing they've got going on here now. Too often in our past, guys either were good or weren't good but one didn't hold one's breath looking for "development." Now the message seems to be clear: if you're not getting it done, get your act together or you won't see the field. I like it.
 
:lol: Well, now I need to hear the actual conference.

Exact words: "There's no complainers. There's no b-tches." Harvey Greene won't allow any of the papers to quote that line, and Harv insists that Henning said "b-tchers" not "b-tches"
 
Did anyone hear him say about the strengths and weaknesses of the WRs that "There aren't any b-tches"?

Yeah, that was my favorite part. I loved it!! It's so refreshing to get to hear from these guys.
 
Exact words: "There's no complainers. There's no b-tches." Harvey Greene won't allow any of the papers to quote that line, and Harv insists that Henning said "b-tchers" not "b-tches"

Maybe he was thinking of Terry Glenn....:)
 
This is the only guy in the new fo i have never been totally sold on and here is one of the reasons
You’ve got to get back into the game. You can’t wait around and say, ‘OK, let’s go with the running game.’ Why? You couldn’t do it when you had to, what makes you think you’re going to do it under those conditions.

Maybe because they are FINALLY not expecting it?
Maybe because when you HAD to- they were looking for it?

Okay yes he understands opening up the passing game by running the ball (which is not what we need right now) BUT Honestly i do not think it even crosses his mind to open up the running game with the passing game.

And the more i think about the above quote the more angry i get, and i am angry because it scares the heck out of me
 
Hold on...Dan Fouts's arm was no stronger than Penningtons? It's been alot of years and alot of Rum and, Cokes since Fouts was around, but, I seem to remember him having a rocket.
 
i hate henning. his best days are behind him but i really hope im wrong
 
Dan Henning didn't quit on routes. Dan Henning didn't allow CBs to push him all over the field.

You want to blame him for the game?

Maybe HE had already seen all of these traits in practices for months... YOU hadn't until Sunday. So, you want to say he's the reason. Maybe he planned the BEST plays we have in our playbook suited for this group of confidence-lacking, bumbling-handed, discipline-lacking, effortless and weak WRs we have.

Wilford inactive.... Ginn showing no courage or heart, Hagan not realizing he has to catch the ball....

Leaving us will all heart Camarillo and a disrespected Bess.

Yet, you expect miracles from this group. As if a light bulb came on.

Yea, let's blame Henning... that's the correct thing to do. He should have called more plays to showcase Ginn's lack of abilities. Yea... that's what he should have done.

Henning adjusted in game... The adjustment was called Anthony Fasano and David Martin. After 3 quarters of watching this pitiful crew of WRs fail Pennington, Henning gave the TE's a chance to save us. And they did their part. We come back to the WRs to win the game... and OOPS... WE LOST. Big shock. Thanks Ted Ginn, Jr. Next time just mail it in from home. Save us the roster spot.
 
Dan Henning didn't quit on routes. Dan Henning didn't allow CBs to push him all over the field.

You want to blame him for the game?

Maybe HE had already seen all of these traits in practices for months... YOU hadn't until Sunday. So, you want to say he's the reason. Maybe he planned the BEST plays we have in our playbook suited for this group of confidence-lacking, bumbling-handed, discipline-lacking, effortless and weak WRs we have.

Wilford inactive.... Ginn showing no courage or heart, Hagan not realizing he has to catch the ball....

Leaving us will all heart Camarillo and a disrespected Bess.

Yet, you expect miracles from this group. As if a light bulb came on.

Yea, let's blame Henning... that's the correct thing to do. He should have called more plays to showcase Ginn's lack of abilities. Yea... that's what he should have done.

Henning adjusted in game... The adjustment was called Anthony Fasano and David Martin. After 3 quarters of watching this pitiful crew of WRs fail Pennington, Henning gave the TE's a chance to save us. And they did their part. We come back to the WRs to win the game... and OOPS... WE LOST. Big shock. Thanks Ted Ginn, Jr. Next time just mail it in from home. Save us the roster spot.


phinfan40353 is dan henning
 
Back
Top Bottom