HERALD: Dolphins’ Dilemma: Stick with a Winning Formula or Adapt? | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

HERALD: Dolphins’ Dilemma: Stick with a Winning Formula or Adapt?

Perfect72

It's Only Happened ONCE!
Joined
May 18, 2004
Messages
1,448
Reaction score
665
Location
Florida
The Miami Dolphins are dealing with a classic dilemma now and, no biggie, it could only determine the winner of their game Sunday and set the tone and direction for this team the remainder of the season.

Coach Adam Gase’s team, you know by now, is riding a four-game win streak primarily because everyone decided about a month ago that with a healthy offensive line and running back Jay Ajayi, the Dolphins could be a physical run-first team. Their success being that team helped defenders stay off the field, which kept them fresh and made them better, and kept quarterback Ryan Tannehill from doing too much, including making mistakes.

With all that coming together … Voila.

Winning.


The winning formula seemed to give the Dolphins a personality as a tough team that could push even the best run-stopping defenses and impose will on an entire game.

So it’s obvious the best way to continue winning is to continue being the same team.

“We want to be able to wear down defenses by the fourth quarter and create those big runs we’ve been able to have,” Ajayi said last week. “We want to keep on that course, keep productive on the ground and open up the passing game.

“I run angry and run hard through all four quarters. I don’t think that’s going to change.”

Except it might all change.

The Dolphins’ problem in continuing to be the same team is they don’t have the same personnel. The healthy, whole offensive line that was the foundation for the past month’s success is gone now.

Left tackle Branden Albert is out following wrist surgery. Center Mike Pouncey is doubtful for the game and the Dolphins are not holding out great hope he can play. Pouncey, by the way, left California to see a specialist on the East Coast last week. He was then scheduled to rejoin the team out west.

The point is even if Pouncey gets the green light to play, he missed two days of practice and flew 5,000 miles round trip on aching hips. So even the best-case scenario for him playing Sunday is not optimal.

Meanwhile, backup Kraig Urbik is going to start in place of Laremy Tunsil at left guard and Anthony Steen is scheduled to start at center for Pouncey. So that dominant offensive line that led the Dolphins’ charge on this win streak?

Phffft! Gone. A memory.

There’s also this: The Rams are not a great team. They have a 4-5 record. Their offense is last in the NFL in points per game.

But they have an outstanding defensive front. Their defensive front is so good, Dolphins offensive coordinator Clyde Christensen conjured memories of yesteryear’s Fearsome Foursome when talking about these Rams.[FONT=&quot]
[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot][/FONT]
So practically the only thing the Rams do really well is precisely that which will match up with what is apparently now a Miami weakness. And at stake when that Rams strength and Dolphins weakness meet is the way the Dolphins want to play and how they have been authoring their recent victories.

That puts the Rams in perfect position to rob the Dolphins of their personality.

Of course, the Dolphins refuse to admit this is possible — at least in public.

“We won’t change what we’re doing, I don’t believe,” Christensen said. “We’ve got a good game plan, and we know it may be the best defense we’ve played this year. But we won’t change the philosophy. That part of it won’t change.

“Guys got to jump in and they’ve got to do their job. We’ve got to be on our mess and if we are, we’ll be right in this thing, and if we’re not, we’ll be out of it. We’ll have trouble with them.”

Privately, however, the Dolphins understand they might have to head in a different direction to move the football against Los Angeles.

And all this leads us to the Dolphins’ grand dilemma: Do they ignore the fact they are undermanned and facing perhaps the best defensive front they’ve seen all season and try to do what they’ve been doing — all the time risking failure and perhaps the game?

Or do the Dolphins move forward with the idea of letting Tannehill throw the football, making receiver Jarvis Landry once again the offense’s focal point, thereby going away from their winning formula with the hope that using this other approach works — even if it didn’t work earlier in the season when the team was 1-4?

More at LINK: http://www.miamiherald.com/sports/spt-columns-blogs/armando-salguero/article115869348.html


Your thoughts? :ponder:
 
you use the run to set up the playaction. why wouldn't that still be the plan?
 
I thought every team we played so far had the best defense we have seen all year?
 
The Miami Dolphins are dealing with a classic dilemma now and, no biggie, it could only determine the winner of their game Sunday and set the tone and direction for this team the remainder of the season.

Coach Adam Gase’s team, you know by now, is riding a four-game win streak primarily because everyone decided about a month ago that with a healthy offensive line and running back Jay Ajayi, the Dolphins could be a physical run-first team. Their success being that team helped defenders stay off the field, which kept them fresh and made them better, and kept quarterback Ryan Tannehill from doing too much, including making mistakes.

With all that coming together … Voila.

Winning.


The winning formula seemed to give the Dolphins a personality as a tough team that could push even the best run-stopping defenses and impose will on an entire game.

So it’s obvious the best way to continue winning is to continue being the same team.

“We want to be able to wear down defenses by the fourth quarter and create those big runs we’ve been able to have,” Ajayi said last week. “We want to keep on that course, keep productive on the ground and open up the passing game.

“I run angry and run hard through all four quarters. I don’t think that’s going to change.”

Except it might all change.

The Dolphins’ problem in continuing to be the same team is they don’t have the same personnel. The healthy, whole offensive line that was the foundation for the past month’s success is gone now.

Left tackle Branden Albert is out following wrist surgery. Center Mike Pouncey is doubtful for the game and the Dolphins are not holding out great hope he can play. Pouncey, by the way, left California to see a specialist on the East Coast last week. He was then scheduled to rejoin the team out west.

The point is even if Pouncey gets the green light to play, he missed two days of practice and flew 5,000 miles round trip on aching hips. So even the best-case scenario for him playing Sunday is not optimal.

Meanwhile, backup Kraig Urbik is going to start in place of Laremy Tunsil at left guard and Anthony Steen is scheduled to start at center for Pouncey. So that dominant offensive line that led the Dolphins’ charge on this win streak?

Phffft! Gone. A memory.

There’s also this: The Rams are not a great team. They have a 4-5 record. Their offense is last in the NFL in points per game.

But they have an outstanding defensive front. Their defensive front is so good, Dolphins offensive coordinator Clyde Christensen conjured memories of yesteryear’s Fearsome Foursome when talking about these Rams.[FONT="]
[/FONT][/COLOR]
[COLOR=#000000][FONT="][/FONT]

So practically the only thing the Rams do really well is precisely that which will match up with what is apparently now a Miami weakness. And at stake when that Rams strength and Dolphins weakness meet is the way the Dolphins want to play and how they have been authoring their recent victories.

That puts the Rams in perfect position to rob the Dolphins of their personality.

Of course, the Dolphins refuse to admit this is possible — at least in public.

“We won’t change what we’re doing, I don’t believe,” Christensen said. “We’ve got a good game plan, and we know it may be the best defense we’ve played this year. But we won’t change the philosophy. That part of it won’t change.

“Guys got to jump in and they’ve got to do their job. We’ve got to be on our mess and if we are, we’ll be right in this thing, and if we’re not, we’ll be out of it. We’ll have trouble with them.”

Privately, however, the Dolphins understand they might have to head in a different direction to move the football against Los Angeles.

And all this leads us to the Dolphins’ grand dilemma: Do they ignore the fact they are undermanned and facing perhaps the best defensive front they’ve seen all season and try to do what they’ve been doing — all the time risking failure and perhaps the game?

Or do the Dolphins move forward with the idea of letting Tannehill throw the football, making receiver Jarvis Landry once again the offense’s focal point, thereby going away from their winning formula with the hope that using this other approach works — even if it didn’t work earlier in the season when the team was 1-4?

More at LINK: http://www.miamiherald.com/sports/spt-columns-blogs/armando-salguero/article115869348.html


Your thoughts? :ponder:

As I pointed in a thread....the Rams have lost both games to teams that run more than pass....and are 4-3 against teams that challenge them with a majority of passes.

Its obvious to me with stick with run and play action...let Tannehill roll out with the option.

We stick to what we've been doing.
 
You have to adapt game-by-game in today's NFL. Doesn't mean you get away from the run, but there will be times when it isn't effective. With Albert out the team will likely have to pass more to win games. That's the simple fact.

Moving forward the team has tough choices on the offensive line. Do you keep Albert, who is a good player but not someone you can count on for 16 games? Same question really with Pouncey. Miami may have to draft an offensive lineman pretty high.
 
I Domt think out offensive line changes anything. Well probably run the same rinky dink offense we ran vs the jets.
 
As I pointed in a thread....the Rams have lost both games to teams that run more than pass....and are 4-3 against teams that challenge them with a majority of passes.

Its obvious to me with stick with run and play action...let Tannehill roll out with the option.

We stick to what we've been doing.

That can be misleading though because when teams have a lead they run more and vice versa.
 
Our coaching staff will have a game plan to do what is necessary to win the game. If it falters early, make adjustments and do plan B to win the game. In the Chargers game, the Dolphins made adjustments and changed the game plan a bit and it worked to perfection. Gase has shown me if they contain the run early, change it up and then go back to it with surprise. If we run well and get an early lead 14-0 or 10-3 we follow the script and plan and keep on keeping on. If we are down 7-0 or 10-3 we change it and make adjustments to get back in the game. This mini 4-game winning streak has shown everybody including myself that they are not bowing out or sulking they battle back and find a a way to win the game. That is refreshing. There is no dilemma JUST DO YOUR JOB and we'll be fine. GO DOLPHINS!!!
 
I Domt think out offensive line changes anything. Well probably run the same rinky dink offense we ran vs the jets.

A big part of that was the lack of Stills throughout most of the game. DVP didn't show up. All we had was Juice and the TE's. Oh and we won the game...


Dmac
 
Continue to feed Ajayi. Tanny will need quick passes and perhaps some rollouts on play action.

They've scored 29 points in their last 12 quarters with Keenum. Unless Goff is the Messiah, I would expect them to put up no more than 2 TDs.
 
What a stupid question.

The thing a just cobbled together OL does not do well is pass block. On the other hand, they can still run block because it is simpler.

So we stay with the girl we came to the dance with, the running game. We can still run and luckily for us, Ryan Tannehill is playing lights out right now.

If you were the Rams DC watching film this week, what part of our game seems weak to you? Albert is out but our starting LT to be in shifting over and a "better" guard then the ones who were released weeks ago. And I'm sure this has been planned for.

I'd run the ball 65% of the time unless the Rams take a big lead. If we take a big lead I'd run 75% of the time.....lol

---------- Post added at 03:13 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:12 PM ----------

I thought every team we played so far had the best defense we have seen all year?

It kind of makes you think that we can run the ball..............
 
I am trying to remember if someone had posted an article after the Seattle game that Gase has these deep shot plays that he only uses in certain situations and it was stated the the Stills drop was one of those plays...

but anyway

On our first possession, I'd like to see Tannehill connect on a PA pass right off the bat deep down the field. This would be the perfect opportunity to do so with them publicly stating they will stick with the game plan.
 
Does Gase panic and start trying to pass it all over the place and expose Tannehill if a line he doesn't quite trust can't get any push in the running game? Armando seems to think this could be the game they are forced back to early season form on offense.
 
Back
Top Bottom