HERALD: Dolphins to weigh moving Kiko Alonso from Middle Linebacker | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

HERALD: Dolphins to weigh moving Kiko Alonso from Middle Linebacker

Perfect72

It's Only Happened ONCE!
Joined
May 18, 2004
Messages
1,450
Reaction score
666
Location
Florida
During an animated meeting in December the Miami Dolphins considered moving Kiko Alonso out of his middle linebacker spot and to an outside (weakside) position to address some of the flaws among the team’s linebacker corps.

The idea was to move Alonso outside and use second-year reserve Mike Hull as the team’s middle linebacker instead. And the argument for the change was that Alonso outside and Hull in the middle could be more productive than, say, Alonso in the middle and reserve Spencer Paysigner or someone else outside.
[FONT=&quot][/FONT]
Ultimately, the idea was rejected.

The Dolphins, sources say, didn’t want to “mess with Kiko’s head” three months into the season by asking him to move. The team also wasn’t certain moving Alonso to a position he had not played or practice much at the entire season would be an upgrade.

So nothing happened.

But this offseason ... the move will be revisited.

Why?

The Dolphins, who expect to address the linebacker position with the addition of perhaps two new starters out of the three positions, want flexibility in their search for upgrades. And with an Alonso move on the table, scouts don’t necessarily have to limit their search to weakside and strongside linebackers. They can search for a middle linebacker as well.

So, for example, if the best available linebacker is a middle linebacker, the team can go in that direction and move Alonso outside -- accomplishing what it set out to do, which is improve the entire unit.

Really, these next few months are a two-fold evaluation of our roster, and trying to make that better, and then our scheme fit, and trying to make that better,” new defensive coordinator Matt Burke said. “It kind of goes hand and hand. We’ll see what other type of players we bring in through free agency and the draft and where Kiko fits in.

“Obviously we see him as an important piece of the future. I had a great time working with him and helping him get to that point; but, we really haven’t even started to evaluate position moves, fits, schemes, all of that stuff. That’s going to be an ongoing process.”

More at LINK: http://www.miamiherald.com/sports/spt-columns-blogs/armando-salguero/article126974889.html

Your thoughts? :ponder:
 
Very smart move, Kiko is an awkward fit at mlb

Kiko made key plays this year, but he also gave up a lot of big plays.
 
I think that's the right move. He can play OLB for us next to Cunningham
 
If we can draft Cunningham then Miami will be in great shape going into the future.

Him manning the mike, with Kiko manning the weakside.
 
About time the FO started listening to what we're saying here in our site....lol......for real though, we see that's he's too small to play the middle so good to see they see it too

Ozzy rules!!
 
In fairness to Kiko, he brought an instinctual aspect to the MIKE position we haven't seen since Dansby manned it 5 years ago. He was playing at an above average to high level before he hurt his hand and it just became a challenge for him from that point. Tackling became more difficult and when you are already undersized for the position you need every advantage you can get.

Not gonna lie, I really wanted Perryman in 2015. I know many people did not because he wasn't seen as a 3 down MIKE and somewhat short, but he would of given you the instincts and the toughness on those early downs and he isn't a complete liability in pass coverage. Phillips better be damn good in 2017 because Perryman is starting to shine on that Chargers defense.
 
Should have leaved kiko where he was and brought in hewitt and lived with the results

If im miami i prefer mike and weak versatility in this add on lb that way if i lose one starter at one of those slots im not screwed by the depth

The drop off is major in miami at lb once you get past the first team...no depth at mike no depth at weak evidently or nickel options
 
Hot damn. Imagine that. What a concept.

little-boy-dancing-o.gif



But, didn't want to "mess with his head"? Is his mental state as weak as his LB play?

You do what is best for the team. If the player can't handle it then you move on.



In fairness to Kiko, he brought an instinctual aspect to the MIKE position we haven't seen since Dansby manned it 5 years ago. He was playing at an above average to high level before he hurt his hand and it just became a challenge for him from that point. Tackling became more difficult and when you are already undersized for the position you need every advantage you can get.

:bs:

Coaching staff wouldn't have been contemplating the move in November had he played above average, let alone at a h . . . hi . . . I can't even bring myself to say it. BTW, his thumb injury occurred after the fact in December.
 
The plan of Hull at Mike and Kiko at Weak would have worked alot better then what happened. Hull is a good tackler, limited athletically but a good tackler
 
I dont think it would have helped...just would have changed the target from paysinger to hull

Kikos carry coverage play is something mami better seriously consider here...best to pair him with a top shelf athlete whatever we do

I think you are better off with kiko at mike in the nickel even if you were to kick him outside in base...better add something else that can play though before you do anything...cause right now you got kiko and crap
 
Isn't it nice having a coach that doesn't try to fit square pegs into round holes?
 
Hot damn. Imagine that. What a concept.

little-boy-dancing-o.gif



But, didn't want to "mess with his head"? Is his mental state as weak as his LB play?

You do what is best for the team. If the player can't handle it then you move on.





:bs:

Coaching staff wouldn't have been contemplating the move in November had he played above average, let alone at a h . . . hi . . . I can't even bring myself to say it. BTW, his thumb injury occurred after the fact in December.

Your assumption was this move contemplation was about kiko and not what he was paired with at that time in paysinger or the other in house options...that assumption would be a bad one
 
Back
Top Bottom