so-long-Ricky
Seasoned Veteran
I know it's always easier to evaluate things afterwards but here's my question. The Fins were looking like a very good team the 2nd half of last years season. The offense was gelling nicely w/Gus and Chambers. Ronnie was looking like a solid pick that was going to pay huge divedends in the years to come......my question is, after all the gains that were made wouldn't have been more reasonable for Saban to beef up the offensive line, bring in some young players w/talent that have nothing but an upside to their careers instead of spending 50million on a QB w/questionable injuries?
I know, putting the season in the hands of Gus would be a gamble but I really don't see the situation much different than Minnesota when they went with Brad and traded Daunte to Miami for a 2nd rounder. Everything seemed to be going great for a 1st year coach
It just seems to me that Miami had a great "game plan" in the works and basically gambled a lot of it (not being able to bring in new players, giving up a 2nd round pick, trading for an injured QB) on questionable decisions.
I know, putting the season in the hands of Gus would be a gamble but I really don't see the situation much different than Minnesota when they went with Brad and traded Daunte to Miami for a 2nd rounder. Everything seemed to be going great for a 1st year coach
It just seems to me that Miami had a great "game plan" in the works and basically gambled a lot of it (not being able to bring in new players, giving up a 2nd round pick, trading for an injured QB) on questionable decisions.