I'd argue (not that it really matters anyways) that if you want to pride yourself on consistency then the your original post is lacking. They seem to have been lacking for a for a few weeks now. You have a clear opportunity to rebuttal this criticism with analysis of Dallas Thomas/Jason Fox tackle play or defensive scheme and problems; yet you deliver a veritable "Tannehill is the best...he's number one...the absolute best...no one compares...defense sucks".
All-in-all, I think there is a large opportunity for opinions and analysis that reach beyond the flotsam and jetsam that ESPN, CBS, FOX, NBC, and on some degree NFLN bore us with. Things like (fictitious statement, this is not validated in anyway) "Looking at the all-22, 65% of time Tannehill goes for intermediary routes on press coverage. On this play action, he sees the safety pull into the box pre-snap ..." That's what I think people want to see, want to hear, want to read, and want to learn. You can't call yourself a teacher and defend original posts like the one in this thread.
Nevertheless, nothing is free and I'm not paying you for content. As a result
I lurk and take your analysis, if there is one, as an opinion and then move on in the chaos I call life.
*Note my punctuation and logical semblances of paragraphs.