Discussion in 'Beasts of the AFC East' started by BahamaFinFan78, Aug 24, 2018.
Yeah idk what you seen tonight that would guarantee us a loss
I saw him lead his team to a pounding in the Cotton Bowl last year at the hands of OSU.
I'm not sold on Darnold. We'll see, he was a turnover magnet in college and all of the rookies have looked good in preseason with the exception of Jackson maybe
**** the Jets.
The Jets very well may have themselves a QB.... but whether they do or not, they’re still the Jets, and they can still gargle my balls.
I find it interesting how many people have watched the NFL for a decade plus and still believe a rookie to be the answer for 10+ years off a few starts or limited exposure. I have seen QB's come rolling out the gates to only sputter out and do nothing. I will wait more than a year before saying they have a franchise qb..... That said it is possible but I wouldn't say we had a franchise QB for 10+ years if we had him so I won't with them.
May I suggest two words.
I remember when Matt Ryan came out and people called said he was turnover prone because of his 19 INT's his senior year while others said it was due to the talent around him. Looking back at it now it seems that was over blown.
Well we just did it lol, I wasn't as big on Darnold and yesterday showed why.
Yeah, that thread didn't age well. But no surprise seeing who is the thread starter.
It's been said many times Darnold is a good prospect. I dont think he was the home run prospect some people made him out to be but he is a good one. That being said his issue has always been decision making and bad turnovers.