how many wins would Moore have | Page 7 | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

how many wins would Moore have

I agree he should be playing but the idiots that run this team will stick with their decision because they are thick headed just like the Henne crap.
 
He's already had a chance with Carolina and some time with the Dolphins. The answer is no. I like Moore and all but you can clearly see he is not going to be an elite QB. At least with Tannehill you still can see if he develops (even if you dont think he will).
 
vere76 said:
Howmany wins would Mooer have this year at this point. I think 4-3. please don't tell me he shouldnt be in there because Ryan Tannehill is losing us games by throwing back breaking interceptions and fumbles the ball.the stuff in between is with mediocre quarterbacks do.
Click to expand...

With Moore we might be at best 1-6, can't see him out-dueling Luck, like Tannehill did, and doubt he is able to get that final drive for a touchdown against the Falcons.
 
I'm not sure Moore couldve made all the good plays that led to points, so it might be a draw that way and we'd still lose.

I like Moore if and when Tannehill gets injured. He brings a spark that way as a 'relief pitcher', but when he starts, he becomes the journeyman that has bounced from 3 different teams for a reason. He has the same poise issues, to a certain extent that Tannehill has. Moore's physical skills are plenty good to start in the NFL. It's intangibles that are less than that of a quality NFL starter. If you wanna know Matt Moore, watch the game from 12/24/2011. That second half looks just like Tannehill.
 
iamtiv said:
I'm not sure Moore couldve made all the good plays that led to points, so it might be a draw that way and we'd still lose.

I like Moore if and when Tannehill gets injured. He brings a spark that way as a 'relief pitcher', but when he starts, he becomes the journeyman that has bounced from 3 different teams for a reason. He has the same poise issues, to a certain extent that Tannehill has. Moore's physical skills are plenty good to start in the NFL. It's intangibles that are less than that of a quality NFL starter. If you wanna know Matt Moore, watch the game from 12/24/2011. That second half looks just like Tannehill.
Click to expand...

I agree, there were some attributes to that Moore start that resemble Tannehill.
 
Moore would be 7-0 He's another Marino being ignored.
Moore is crap.
 
If you watch Hard Knocks it is clear that they came out of camp and there was no clear winner in the QB competition after Garrard went down cleaning his freaking pool. Tanny was given the nod because of his high draft pick. When you draft a QB as a new coach you are committed to him. I don't think Moore is better than Tannehill, but I do think he would cut down on the turnovers and sacks which have been unacceptable IMO. Worst case scenario, Moore comes in and plays well, then his stock goes up in a league that is starving for QB talent and we get something back in return. If we lose to the Bengals on Thurs, what do we have to lose?
 
ConvenientTruth said:
With Moore this team would be undefeated....he is clearly the best QB on the roster and Ireland and Philbin are just too stubborn to see it. I'm sure Ireland is fielding call all day about Moore and a potential trade, but they are to scared to let him go and be successful elsewhere. I can almost guarantee you that the Rams offered one of their firsts (easily worth it for the greatness of Moore) and Ireland refused....stoooooopid Ireland. :rolleyes2::rolleyes2::rolleyes2:
Click to expand...

Yup I agree, but then Philbin and Fireland would have to admit they messed up..!!!
 
What's annoying me about Tannehill is I fear he may be too nice a kid. I need a bad ass at QB. A little more Cutler than eFfing Tebow. Kid hasn't shown a killers mentality. He's made a few nice plays but he's gotta become a feared player by playing lights out in the clutch, instead of giving up sack fumbles on cue.
Christ oh mighty!!

Sent from my HTC One X using Tapatalk
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom